Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S
The division has failed in Syria
Written by Nasser Kandil,
At the beginning of this century, the Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad was the first one who has warned according to a clear strategic vision of a plan for dividing the region and agitating the wars and strives on the basis of the races, nationalities, religions, and doctrines. When he talked at the Sharm Al Sheikh Arab Summit in the year 2002 on the eve of the American invasion of Iraq, describing this war which the Arabs gave it their advocacy, atmosphere, and lands that “It is not a war neither against a country nor against a regime, or a ruler. It is a war to break our nation into entities, to fight with each other on a sectarian, doctrinal, racism basis, to secure the security of Israel and to keep it living without worry of any confrontation, and to grant it a social historical legitimacy to breed entities similar to it in the region”.
The occupation of Iraq has occurred, the Prime Minister Rafik Al Hariri has been murdered, and the former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has been executed within a single plan to achieve the project which aimed to fragmentation and strives, despite the confusion of all of these serious events, their sequences and relations according to many mature minds, so this plan agitated the situations in all sectarian, racial, and doctrinal branches. The target is the resistance, which Syria has constituted its castle and Lebanon its spearhead, where the Arab elites and before them the Arab rulers have neglected their tasks. Everyone is preoccupied in favoring, the ruler is favoring the man of the White House for a protection, the writer and the thinker are favoring the ruler asking for a position or money, everyone is looking for a position or a rule that does not bother his master. The supporting of the resistance and Syria is permissible within ( yes) but (no). This No is a part of having strives, sects, and doctrines even in the name of the false secularism by complaining of a sectarian Arab situation, but No here includes Syria and the resistance.
The war of July has happened in Lebanon in the year 2006, the resistance stood still and resisted to the extent of the martyrdom, Syria has showed rare courage with Lebanon, the victory has been achieved, but there were plans to assassinate this victory through the Muslim Brotherhoods, under the name of Arab Spring, the Arab countries collapsed under this Spring, moreover, the Ottoman Sultan, the Qatari ruler, and the money-seekers come to have their shares. There were many attempts to undermine Syria, i.e. in the case of Al- Hariri under the title of (Truth), (No) comes within under the title of ( Democracy). And the innocent inquiry about the nation and the case is summing up in one person and the password was after the murder of Al-Hariri “let us accept the investigation and appease Saudi Arabia”, but later in the time of spring it becomes “ Let him abandon” and we will overthrow the “ conspiracy “
Surely, in the historical moments, the nation is summarized in people, otherwise why million of people have revolted against the retirement of Jamal Abdel Nasser, feeling that his retirement is the second half of a defeat, while its first part has happened in the battlefield in the year 1967? And why there was an international war in which participated officially one hundred and thirty countries, its title is Syria and its slogan Let us keep the regime but Al-Assad departs? And why did the Shabak Report in the year 1973 state that the situation in Syria has accompanied by preparations taken by the President Bashar Al-Assad, who has launched a war like the war of 1973 to the extent that any substitute of the President Al-Assad, no matter how bad he is will be less worse than his presence, so the target is the departure of Al-Assad whatever the cost is.
The war has been launched against Syria and the resistance, the target was clear; the change of the position of Syria in the political geography of the region, but the deepest target was fragmentizing the Syria entity within a new map for the region, since it was difficult to invade Syria as a unit, just to ensure its mobilization from the resistance party to the opposite party in the great confrontation trenches in the region. The national country has withstood, and the motive of its withstanding was the inability to fragmentize the country and its party, despite the flabbiness, the corruption, and the bureaucracy. The corruption was anti-sectarian, and so the bureaucracy. The most important here is that the national remained anti- sectarian; thereby an anti- sectarian majority was constituted in the time of terminating the fear and the gaining as two factors of priority for supporting the current regime without taking consideration of its identity, and the social and political content.So the horror turned into an apparent weapon by the strength of oil and the terrorism’s atonement with the hands of the country’s opponents. The Syrian national majority has favored the army which becomes the legend of the twentieth one century, and has adhered to its symbol; the President Bashar Al-Assad, its steadfastness and presence were supported by the allies, since there is no one bargain on a losing horse in these circumstances, where there is no value for the emotions in the moments of deciding the destination of the countries, otherwise America has had adhered with its Shah, Mubarak, and Zain Ben Ali.
The obstacle in failing the war of overthrowing is the same which prevented the war of division, which is the presence of the anti-sectarian majority, therefore, the occupation of the southern Syrian the Golan, and northern in Iskenderun or the eastern in Raqqa and Deir Al zour does not mean and will not mean the success in dividing Syria, because through the presence of this anti-sectarian majority which is adhering to the big Syrian countries, and where the division’s success is restricted to a comprehensive foreign invasion like the British and the French occupations in the beginning of the twentieth century which followed by the divisions of Sykes Picot Agreement, which were not applied without that occupation, but now the cost of the invasion may lead to a comprehensive war in the region, in which the security of Israel is threatened. Therefore, the only alternative for going through division in Syria is by agitating Iraq doctrinally and ethnically, so Saudi Arabia and Turkey will be divided hoping to reach this division in Syria, but this is a big adventure which its consequences are unguaranteed, and maybe its loss is higher of its profits. Saudi Arabia will be divided on the basis of that the Iraqi southern territory will grant the oil and the gulf within small states under the protection of Iran. Turkey will be divided on the basis of that the Iraqi northern territory will put the coast of Turkey with the coast of Syria and Lebanon under a similar banner close to Iran. The choice was to descend the tree and instead of giving Iran the empire of the Mediterranean and the Gulf at once, is to engage into a negotiation about the conditions of the empire.
Syria has protected the region the resistance, the position of Russian and Iran as the same as the resistance which was loyal, Iran was generous and Russia was proud. O, God I certify that I have conveyed. Let’s remember, may the re-acquirement is useful.
2014-12-05 | عدد القراءات 2787
