,

During all the crises which afflict Syria, the mutual relationship between principled and strategic clarity and the tactical ambiguity repeats, so the world wonders what shall Syria do, and what is the reality of its attitude. Syria has often been prejudiced by its friends, through the rash suspicion of its steady attitude, without been treated fairly, after the image has revealed an honorable fact.

Two days ago, the articles, social media, and TV channels are filled with the analysis, that talked about Syria’s attitude toward the issues of the American raids on ISIL, and the fallen of the Syrian plane over the Golan.

The permanent attitude of Syria during these four years towards the war that tries to hit it, its existence, ascendancy, and its army has only one title; what is going on, is aggression through terrorism means. The involvers in this war will discover that they have taken care of their killers and have turned their back from fighting them, but if the deception is still their motive, then the terrorism will arise and will be rooted.

What Syria has expected, has come true even in the announced attitudes of the waged powers and countries, Syria’s attitude is in conformity with establishing an international front to fight terrorism, the involvers have insisted on their claims about their ability to win over terrorism and Syria together, after they had failed to defeat Syria through terrorism.

The situation between Syria and America has risen, regarding the American attacks of Syrian targets without any cooperation with the Syrian country, despite the announcements of Syria and its allies in Russia and Iran that this will be an aggression. When the raids happened, Syria announced that it had known about them before they occurred, through its ambassador in New York, » CNN « network and the articles which are close to the White House have confirmed what Syria has announced, despite the American negation.

Syria does not say that if it has been notified about the raids, it will consider this acceptable or legitimate, but at the same time it does not consider it an aggression. And that, if it accepted this prior notification as an explanation of the content of this coordination, it will not consider it acceptable in every time , moreover, it does not say that, if it considers this as an aggression, then it will confront or will be satisfied with settling its legal diplomatic attitude. The assured reaction of Syria is, it will confront any process that directed to its army.

Ambiguity means that Syria will determine its attitude strategically, and will keep this tactical ambiguity in order to have a grip on the initiative, and thereby it will take the appropriate decisions upon the presented political and field data and the balances of powers. It is important to not let this issue finally settled on a reassuring standard, that enables its adversaries to understand the Syrian equation.

According to the plane which Israel has announced its fallen over Golan, it is easy for Syria to respond, escalate, and push the whole front towards tension. And accordingly, the Security Council will hold, to consider this, an additional threat to the international peace and security, and so the American-Israeli demand will be the return to the disengagement which is signed in 1974, and which Syria has announced its breaking down after the Israeli raids on Jamraya, when President Bashar Al-Assad has announced on that day the opening of the front,  Israel was seeking to have the return to the disengagement agreement. After the failure of the raids of preventing consequently Syria and the resistance from executing the processes of Al Qusayr and Yabroud, Syria and the resistance responded to the raids through specific processes in Golan and Shebaa farms, and which the Israeli has considered as a common decision between Syria and the resistance to expand the Israeli anxiety front to affect the borders of Palestine with Syria and Lebanon.

The Israeli’s security plan by Al-Nosrah front was a negotiated paper for the return of disengagement agreement; the Syrian response, was a violation of one of the Syrian aircrafts over the areas, which the agreement stipulated on preventing the entrance of their flights, so Israel has caused the fall of the plane, and the Syrian response was ambiguous. Most probably, Syria will repeat this violation, even if this costs a second or a third plane, because the aim is to have this equation opened on all the possibilities, and just Syria has the decision and the initiative.

Not everything that seems inherent, is in reality a true, since the ambiguity is a strategic intelligence, but the hurried ones will not pay attention to.

2014-09-26 | عدد القراءات 1692