From the beginning of the crisis in Syria, Washington formally has announced its leadership of the war against Syria, the race towards the opposition between Damascus and Washington was open, but the title of this race has changed according to each stage. The title in the beginning was a call for a dialogue and for overthrowing the regime, Washington won, then it became the political or the military solution, Washington won again, then it was the negotiation solution or the comprehensive war , Syria began to win, the opposition was pulled to Geneva and Washington’s fleets came out loaded with chemical weapons.
The dangerous title for the racing between Washington-Damascus equations, is regarding the American equation which Hillary Clinton has launched saying when she was a Secretary of State; there is not a threat of terrorism in Syria, and what is present are just secondary phenomenona resulted from the extremism of some groups and the coming of some volunteers in response to the brutality of the regime and its crimes, but when the regime overthrows and the opposition controls the rule, then these phenomena will disappear. On the contrary, there was a Syrian equation, which the President Bashar Al-Assad has announced saying, when the opposition refuses to make a dialogue, neither to amend the constitution, nor to participate in the elections, moreover it insists on carrying weapons, kills citizens, destroys the infrastructures of the country, and deals with foreigners, then what Syria faces is not an opposition but terrorism, and those who are betting on an armed opposition are themselves who arm and finance the terrorism, so they will discover, even if they are too late, that this way will expose them to the same dangers which they plan for Syria, Now they discover but it is too late.
A Syrian official says, we feel bitterly when we say that our point of view has won, since this matter is not a cause of happiness, because this has imposed Syria to present excessive sacrifices and a radicalization of terrorism, but it is not too late, since they waste time and opportunities.
Today, Washington is betting on a new equation even through media, its title is “We can fight ISIL without recognizing the need to cooperate with the Syrian country and the confession of its view through establishing an opposition fights both the country and ISIL together” on the other hand the Syrian country succeeds in transferring the wear which ISIL suffers from, to all the armed groups through influencing the morale, and transferring it from north to the capital and its surrounding. In fact the bombardment does not transfer but the reactants of the psychological depression do, the equation is whenever Washington organizes a hundred of oppositionists outside Syria, Syria in return will disengage thousands inside it, in order to reach the year which is intended to build an armed opposition in, with its empty camps. Here are the battles of Adra and what is coming after, is a lesson to have a moral.
In Lebanon, before three years, there was a similar race between Hezbollah and Saad Al-Hariri, about the existence of terrorism in Lebanon, the extent of its danger and its seriousness, and about the equation of “except for the coming of Hezbollah to Syria , Al-Qaeda would be in Beirut, and except for the fighting of Hezbollah in Syria, Lebanon would not been threatened by Al-Qaeda” The world has gathered itself from thousands of kilometers to fight and say that the triumph of terrorism in Syria is constituting a threat to the security of the whole countries, thus Al-Hariri has evidently accepted the speech of Barack Obama, Francois Hollande and the King Abdullah, but he still refuses to acknowledge the true speech of AL- Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah.
Today there is another kind of race, it’s title “ Is it possible to avoid the risk of ISIL and Al-Nosrah without Lebanese-Syrian cooperation, or does this cooperation increase the danger, does the entrance of the army to Arsal strengthen the negotiation attitude of liberating the kidnapped or increase the danger?
The fear is if Obama does not acknowledge what Syria has said , and this is acceptable between two countries despite the danger of wasting time, but the utmost fear is when Al-Hariri accepts what the whole world said and refuses it from a partner from the same homeland, so this means the waste of the whole homeland.
2014-09-30 | عدد القراءات 1611
