Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S
Washington replaced Riyadh, Ankara, & Tel Aviv with Tehran … So it becomes adamant
Written by Nasser Kandil,
Whenever an American official directed to Riyadh, Ankara, or Tel Aviv, it is obvious for an observer to see that the feet of this official whoever was such as, the American President Barak Obama, the secretary of state John Kerry or the Minister of Defense Chuck Hagel, will be in that country while his heart and eyes directed to Tehran.
Since Iran has imposed on Washington to drive its attention away from the military choice, and to accept the recognition, that the negotiation choice is the only way for understanding and for mutual interests, and that the content of the negotiation is to deal with the nuclear issue and against it the sanctions and what related consequently to the sensitive regional issues, Washington was looking forward a distinguished relation with Tehran.
The long negotiations do not mean that there will be another end except the mutual understanding between the two parties, as every follower knows that the alternative is not available and the tactical maneuvers between them whether through the omission of what the allies did and just to deliver a message of the ability, cannot be turned once again into an involvement of the comprehensive confrontation.
The two parties experiment severe negotiations that affect the entire Middle East, during which Iran has succeeded in knowing the secret access of Washington’s gates which is how to fall its bet on the major allies with regards of its interests. Saudi Arabia has Yemen and Bahrain, while Israel has Palestine after the Lebanon, Turkey has to bear the burden of the Kurdish equation and the deception outcome regarding ISIL , whenever Iran has taken a successful step in that way and got the consequences of America’s hesitations, the American-Iranian relation becomes a multi-dimensioned goal.
America does not hide its admiration of Iran and its human, military and technical abilities, its political experience, moreover, its ability to bear, move, and expand, but it wonders if it had had an ally or an agent in the region like Iran, then it would have succeeded in absorbing the shocks which the successive crises have represented since the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.
America has waded the illusion of bet on the “Muslim Brotherhood “under Turkish sponsorship, and as a result, it gathered the failure in all of North Africa, then it waded the illusion of bet on Saudi’s money and Israeli’s security altogether, and between them Al-Qaeda’s process, before Turkey which is connected to Qatar has seized ISIL, while Qatar seized Al –Nosrah Front.
Washington realizes that the rising powers in the region are Iran on one hand, and ISIL and the component of the bloody atoning alliance on the other hand, it realizes also that it cannot alone confront the prominent imminent danger of ISIL and its equivalents without Iran and its allies, since they have alone the ability of land intervention which neither the Saudi army which is defeated in front of Houthis , nor Turkey which is busy in its Kurdish priorities in all of its accounts, nor the exhausted Egyptian army, and nor the Israeli one which is incapable of land warfare according to the prove of the war of Gaza. Without Iran and its allies nothing can ensure the security of oil and Gulf, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Lebanon.
The negotiation is going to determine the concept which controls the engagement and the cooperation between the most important international player and its peer regionally, because the settled principle is to reach a clear definite formula for this engagement and cooperation, The clear Iranian formula is the negotiation, understanding, determining the dispute, and linking the conflict where the understanding is becoming sophisticated to deal with one issue against another. it is a relationship based on the rule of non hostility and the mutual understanding of the privates and the vital interests.
The negotiations started when America presented to Iran a uni-option, its content is that Iran will be an outstanding representative of the shares and high gains of managing the American policies and the interests in the region. Washington is still dreaming of Iran. America wants Iran to operate through politics the conflict with Israel but not through a resistance. Iran is not requested to be with Camp David nor to accept the normalization or to abandon of its allies, but just Iran which uses its authority to calm down the conflict. For example, in Syria, Iran is not requested to present Syria to its regional enemies, and not to exploit its influence to facilitate a settlement, but to accept to overlook of a long war of attrition that exhausts Syria that leads to impose conditions related to the localization of Syria in this region, especially that related the Palestinian issue. Washington realizes that it is impossible to achieve this goal, so the presented alternative is the entrance of Iran into the alliance against ISIL, without the cooperation of its allies in Russia, Syria, and Hezbollah. Today Washington has somehow given up by accepting the mutual engagement with Russia, seizing the dispute of Syria, and accepting the contradictory policies of Palestine, It seemed that the anticipating hopes on the success of the current negotiations despite the desires of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel ( the common American gates in the region) is a sign of the American approach of the Iranian acceptance, at least in the process of rebuilding the confidence which Tehran insists on.
2014-10-17 | عدد القراءات 1552
