Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S
My testimony against the testimony of Marwan Hamadeh / Part.2
Written by Nasser Kandil,
Marwan Hamadeh has continued his testimony before the International Court, accompanied by an expensive artificial informative propaganda, he imagined that what he has said of serious secrets will shock the court while he was talking about the President Rafik AL-Hariri who was in his secret, trying to have a Syrian exit of Lebanon since the year 2000. There was no one of the judges who have asked him about the tool which he used in order to know how one can recognize what another thinks in private just in order the International Courts borrow in their investigation with witnesses and the accused. Hamadeh restored the articles of Kuwaiti newspaper ( Politics ) which has published the scenario of the assassination the day after the murder, so either he is their writer, or that he disregarded the court by memorizing words which were published in the newspaper for nearly ten years, or in all cases he tried to belittle the people with the cooperation of the judges who were dignifying the importance instead of investigating and verifying which are of their duties. They were participating in pretending, thus the listening judge will sigh in a (Hollywood) way, and say you are explaining something so dangerous, so please say it in detail.
Hamadeh talked about how the President Al-Hariri thought in private, and what he has known although there is none among his witnesses is still alive, while I have wrote yesterday about what has discussed in the bloc, of a decision on the eve of the extension for the President Emile Lahoud, where there were about twenty witnesses, who are the bloc members, in addition to the coordinator Mohammed Al-Sammak. Hamadeh said that the Lebanese environment was demanding the Syrian withdrawal of Lebanon, and that the President Al-Hariri was interested in this independence project in each region, as the retail manner. I have cited Al-Hariri ‘s speech about the independent Lebanon and his belittlement of those who thought of the possibility to have an independent country in Lebanon especially during the continuation of the Israeli- Arab conflict, and the confining of the choices to a stand by state either in the shelter ( Israeli ) or in the salon ( Syrian ), and how Taif Agreement was the salon, and that the refusal of the extension was an attempt to modify the conditions of the Syrian salon and not ( the Swiss ), but if we had to choose between leaving this salon with all its advantages and disadvantages then the choice was to stay.
Hamadeh mentioned in his speech the exaggerated situation against the Syrian presence through two signs one for the Partirarch Nasrallah Sefei and the other for the Deputy Walid Jumblatt. In the next time I will cite the facts of my last meeting with the Present Al-Hariri, which its facts have been documented at the International Investigation Commission which announced me a suspect, and has raided my home on the same day of announcing the four officers raided their homes as well. I was in Damascus and I returned challenging. But now I will quote the related part of the attitude of the President Al-Hariri towards the moving in ( Korent Chahwan )which Hamadeh has glorified and has considered it something related to Al-Hariri.
During our meeting on the 5th of February 2005 ; before nine days of the assassination, the speech of Al-Hariri was closer in time to what Hamadeh has narrated on his behalf about his attitude, desire, understanding, and what he has wanted from the relation with Syria. The Prsident Al-Hariri has called Wisam Al-Hasan. My speech is documented at the Commission before the death of the Al-Hasan in years, I have challenged him many times if he can falsify my speech while he was at the top of his work as a manager of the intelligence, Al- Hariri wanted from Al-Hasan to narrate for me without inspiring him with anything about the attitude towards the groups of ( Kornet Chahwan), so he said to Al-Hasan “ Narrate for us my meeting with Fares Saeed “ we were near the elevator while he was leaving my home in the year 2000. Al- Hasan said “While Saeed was leaving, the President asked him, is it logic to have this magnitude of hostility against Syria for twenty years. Saeed said without notice: This hostility’s age is one thousand and four hundred years. Al-Hasan added: I have seen the face of Al-Hariri tends to be angry saying: Your problem is with us we the Muslims from the day of the Islamic Conquest, and not with a regime in particular in Syria”. The President Al-Hariri asked Al-Hasan to leave and turned to me and said “This is their truth and I knew it fully, therefore it is impossible for those to be my allies, I have warned Walid Jumblatt from going too far with them. I am different from him, and each one of us has his understanding and his way”.
At the same meeting, Al-Hariri has explained the attitudes of Jumblatt and Chirac after we have reached to an understanding on some of the main lines of the election law, which can constitute an acceptable solution for everyone, and which will be cited in the next article about this meeting and its circumstances. I have suggested to him saying that “if everything happen as it should be, then maybe after you arrange the relation between you and Syria , and regain who you are named as Syrian allies to one position then it would be possible for Jumblatt and the President Jacques Chirac to regain their good relation with Syria” ,the President Al-Hariri said “according to Jumblatt, I saw that he was linked to the concept of waiting between the shelter and the salon, so he decided to go out of the salon and there is no hope in regaining him, the maximum limit which I can is getting his approval of the electoral law, which we talked about , while regarding Chirac, I want to tell you something. After the extension, I called him asking for an appointment; as usual he used to take the line directly as soon as he heard my voice in the phone from the secretary. This time he has not taken the line, and the appointment has been postponed, when he met me, he treated me as if I betray his friendship. He considered that he tried his best to issue the resolution 1559 , so he waited from me a frank efficient refusal for the extension, but I let him down, I do not know how it take time in order to surpass this admonishment or that feeling.”
After the assassination of the President Al-Hariri, I said “Those who have wanted to exploit the President in order to attack Syria, and have failed in the extension, have repeated the attempt again through the electoral file, but when they felt that they will repeat what they have done on the day of the extension, was the only way to engage Al- Hariri in the war against Syria is to kill him. Unfortunately, Hamadeh was one of those who were exploited to continue this war since the assassination date and till now.”
Hamadeh talked about the exaggeration of the situation against the Syrian presence after the Israeli withdrawal in the year 2000 ignoring that April Summit which held in 2000, and which embraced the departed the President Hafez Al-Assad and the American President Bill Clinton in Geneva was a common attempt between the Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and the American President Bill Clinton to have a coverage for the President Al-Assad for a coordinated withdrawal in exchange of securing the presence of the Syrian troops in Lebanon. The refusal of Al-Assad has granted a clean Lebanese victory for the first Arab resistance against the occupation. In the memory is still what Hamadeh was talking about of the moving of Lebanese groups against Syria as was published in the year 1998 by the neo-conservatives. Hamadeh knew that I have held a press conference in the year 2000, at which I presented this document which is called (Clean Break ) and which paved the way for the war of Iraq and Afghanistan under the slogan of overthrowing the castle which is represented by Syria, because of its danger on the security of Israel. I and Hamadeh were talking the same language, but today he is telling us that from that day, he denied it.
To refresh the memory of Hamadeh only. In the year 2004 after the extension and before the attempt of his assassination, he has visited me in my office and asked me to cooperate like friend as long as we have cooperated many times ago in adducting between the President Nabih Berri and the Deputy Jumblatt during their disagreement in the eightieths, in order to do the same thing between Jumblatt and my friend Rustom Ghazaleh whom Hamadeh has related every disaster in Lebanon to him. I said to Hamadeh” If I can help I will not hesitate, I am ready” he said” Walid is so angry of the issue of arresting the official of the Socialist Party Abu Al- Shahid, so the resolving of the matter will help a lot, Rustom the Brigadier General can help despite of the intransigence of Emile Lahoud’s party”, so I called the Brigadier General Ghazaleh and let him talk to Hamadeh after explaining, after the understanding was, Hamadeh told me “that the attitude of Walid as his attitude on the day of electing the President Lahoud it was just an opinion”. On the next day the informative Rossana Bumunsif has written an article in ( AlNahar ) newspaper on the behalf of Jumblatt in which he accused me of trying to penetrate him through Marwan Hemadeh, Hamadeh called me wishing not to respond because Walid was trying to harm him not me, he added “When we will meet I will explain to you more”. After few days Hamadeh was exposed to an assassination attempt. I have visited him accompanied with the Brigadier General Rustom Ghazaleh, the General Prosecutor Adnan Adoum, and the departed Deputy Adnan Arakji. After we assured that he is in peace. Hamadeh turned to the Brigadier General Ghazaleh and said” They will try to drive a wedge between us through similar processes, “But this far from them, this hand in working for Israel”
My speech is documented at the International Investigation Commission on 30-8-2005. The witnesses are still alive. Mr. Marwan. Tomorrow will be what has happened concerning Jumblatt’s attitude from the parliament’s platform in the year 2000
2014-11-21 | عدد القراءات 1675
