* When you listen to the speakers of the armed groups that belong to the opposition while they comment on the bombing which targeted the Iraqi visitors in Bab Musalla and has led to the martyrdom of more than forty people, you listen to a group of criminals who do not have any relation with principles or cause or politics.

* When one of them said that they are enemies, so their killing is serving the cause which he claims, and when another one said that the Syrian governmental services are behind the bombing, we hear a group of impassive people and insane who do not have a place but only in the sanatoriums.

* According to the forces of the resistance the debate is revolving about the validity of the implementation of the martyrdom operations among the settlers in the occupied Palestine and linking them with targeting military sites.

* In the experience of the resistance in Lebanon the implementation of many processes that target important agents were stopped because they could lead to the killing of their sons.

* The policy which becomes a justification for legislating the killing just for the sake of causing pain to the opponent or the enemy even if the victims have no relation with the ongoing conflict is the policy of crime, mafia, and killers. So it is in vain to have among those, anyone who fits for the dialogue.

* The sponsoring countries of the armed groups are indifferent to them.

* For them only the dialogue to devote the surrender is legitimate.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2017-03-22 | عدد القراءات 2382