Nasser Kandil wrote: Between Palmyra and the right to respond

* After the dominance of ISIS on Palmyra after its liberation for the first time, some of those who pretend to be keen to Syria and the resistance talked in a vulgar language about the event doubting about the performance of the Syrian army.

* After Palmyra has been liberated for the second time many of those were absent, did not show the minimum welcoming and happiness for the victory that is supposed that it includes every opponent of terrorism, so how if it is supposed that he advocates Syria and the resistance in their war.

* When Israel was targeting a goal even if it did not hit any, some of those who emerge to be keen to Syria and the resistance said to us publicly that we are fed up with the talk about the right to respond, to the extent that they want to undermine the stability of the leadership of Syria and the resistance, and their capacity to challenge the Israeli provocations.

* Today most of those who criticized are absent after the high level crucial response carried out by Syria against the Israeli violation which was described by the Israelis with the change of the war rules.

* In both cases the skeptics who were absent at the time of repelling and confrontation were continuing winking against the credibility of the alliances of Syria and the resistance with Russia.

* This is an opportunity to expel those from the ranks.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

 

 

2017-03-23 | عدد القراءات 12393