Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S   

Al Sayyed and his new equations: We have to act as world powers in the phase of drawing maps

Written by Nasser Kandil,

With the same degree, Al Sayyed Hasan Nasrollah was prudent of the internal Lebanese dialogue as a humble small Lebanese group that seizes with its approaching center that Hezbollah becomes a major regional power at the same rank of the major countries, it will not retreat to the small Lebanese alleyways, and this escalated speech will not bring it back to a position that is smaller than it. But what do concern the Lebanese parities is that its new rank among the world powers is an added value to Lebanon, as long as it does not spend the excess of its force in improving sectarian or sectional balances, but employing revenue of its role to protect Lebanon from the two dangers the terroristic and the Israeli ones.

With the same degree, Al Sayyed has refused to engage himself into debates with the Prime Minister Saad Al-Hariri, ensuring only the importance of the continuation of the dialogue and praising its seriousness, he insisted on determining what was mentioned by Al-Hariri to abolish what it included of contradictions, staring from accusing Hezbollah of the game of axis, while the spokesman is immersing into the axial to the extent of his mucus cord, passing through the objection towards the speech of Hezbollah that it fought in Syria in an anticipatory way to protect Lebanon, and that the threat is few meters away, while justifying inviting the others to fight anticipatorily, and the threat is hundreds of miles away from them as Italy and Saudi Arabia, and thousands of kilometers away as America. Towards criticizing the attitude of Hezbollah from the revolution of Bahrain, owing not to interfere within the Arab countries’ affairs, while it is calling for the peaceful struggle, renouncing violence, and adopting the dialogue, whereas Al Mostaqbal Movement is involved in the Syrian crisis, and it continues interfering under the slogan of arming, funding, and the call to overthrow the regime. Ending with the call of Al-Hariri to coordinate with the remote groups under the slogan of protecting Lebanon from the threat of terrorism, and the obstinacy in refusing to coordinate with the nearest, which is represented by Syria and which the coordination with it constitutes the urgent need to save Lebanon form the danger of terrorism.

With the same degree, Al Sayyed was ready to accept the difference, and to continue the dialogue from the adversary position, he has called for narrowing the difference to make understandings on the basis of understanding the region and being away from illusions’ threats. For those who asked us to withdraw from Syria, we will continue the dialogue with them, and we will accept the minimum limit of the possible agreement, but at the same time we tell them come with us to Syria and Iraq, because the region in the process of mapping, and there is no mean to resolve the matters, security and the fate of the country alone. But who decided to be absent from the participation of drawing the major maps, then the others will draw the map of his country,  and will decide for him his future, if this is your choice, then we have settled our choice by preventing anyone to determine the fate of our country on our behalf.

For the first time, the Lebanese conservative speech faces the consequences of the difficult choices, Hezbollah has adjusted the rhythm of the resistance on Lebanese narrow considerations for three decades, but the background does not allow for retreating behind the borders, because the engagement and the association among the region’s countries become fateful. Furthermore, Al Sayyed discloses the Lebanese by saying what was possible yesterday, now is no longer possible, because you cannot ask us to use the old language which is no longer benefit nowadays, while our strength meets the requirements of the new language, so why some are grieving rather than being happy.

The most important in the speech of Al Sayyed is further than his call for a comprehensive regional alliance to confront the threat of terrorism, and beyond his discover that this terrorism is an intelligence outcome that works for the Israeli account , as well as beyond his first announcement about the fighting of Hezbollah in Iraq, further than his call for Saudi Arabia to understand the meaning of stubbornness in Syria and Yemen, and the risk of becoming ISIS rooted in them, because the real goal of ISIS is Mecca and Medina. The most important is that Al Sayyed has presented the experience of Hezbollah as a nucleus for Arab popular army to terminate the terrorism, because the confidence is missing through the seriousness of the international abroad, and the optimism is zero according to many governments. In other words, Arab popular front for resisting Israel and terrorism, in which the resistance constitutes the nucleus of its army. …It seems like a call for opening a voluntary door for the youth, gatherings, and Arab parties to engage within this war, at the same time preserving the rights of the intellectual and political diversity, in brief, this is the second turning decisive point of Hezbollah as a leadership for the new Arab stage, which will emerge from the womb of failure of the Arab Spring, and announces a new spring, after the declaration of the public adhering of the regional role as a condition to protect the local role, and towards protecting Lebanon.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2015-02-18 | عدد القراءات 1764