Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S
Ceasing the security coordination is a masterstroke
Written by Nasser Kandil,
Both the timing and resolution are masterstrokes; the Palestinian leadership has well done through a high spirit of a historical responsibility and a historic sense of announcing the ceasing of all kinds of security coordination with the occupation’s authorities.
This resolution is an outcome of the exhaustion of the Palestinian leadership of every possible enticement means, to convince the leaders of the occupation’s entity of the benefits of supporting the presence of a national Palestinian authority, even through committing sins of delivering resisters, activities, and arresting Palestinian fighters by the occupation forces as a result of the information which the occupation forces has got by the security coordination channels. The result is that Israel has destroyed after more than twenty years of Oslo Agreement every elements of forming a Palestinian authority, whether through disconnecting the geography by the separation wall, or terminating the presence of an independent demographic existence of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Jerusalem, through insisting on a settlement policy that changes the demographic identity of the Palestinian territories. In politics, Israel through its all decision-makers levels has sent messages, in which it ensured the absence of any resolution about the peace process, no matter how it is distorted or deformed like the way presented by the Americans.
This resolution is a correction of a historical mistake although belatedly, and a justice of Palestinian resisters and activists project, those Palestinians who are living the bitterness of anticipation and expecting the fall in the hands of the subsequent body of the Palestinian authority rather than fearing of the direct fall in the hands of the occupation forces. Therefore that resolution will be a reconsideration of the nationalism of the body of authority, which was accused of its nationalism through the coordination with the occupation, so this has made it a mercenary militia, its duty is to protect the security of the occupation rather than protecting the security of its citizens from the occupation.
This resolution as well is a step towards bridge the gap between the national factions and the authority, it puts the leadership of Hamas Movement and the project of the national reconciliation at steak, where the Palestinian activities, and the ones who are concerned with the Palestinian issue can ask Hamas Movement about any delay or slowdown in seizing the resolution in a way that is suitable for the Palestinians and their resistance through a united Palestinian vision against the occupation.
Because the resolution is timing, so it is an addition, it expresses a historical responsibility with a historic sense. Palestine is an independent country; it has a decent rank in the international organizations, and got the admission of Western countries which their areas are increasing gradually. Nowadays the world is looking towards Palestine and its case in a different way than it was many years ago. The arrogant Israel is in isolation that expands and grows, it is a good time in which Israel will face such of this behavior, so it will lose its good conduct certificate, which is this security coordination, thus it will be dealt consequentially as all racial discrimination’s authorities.
the timing of the resolution is based on the aggravation in the Israeli American relationships, it is unnecessary and not incidental aggravation, it is an outcome of the Israeli insistence upon a Middle Eastern scene, in which Israel remains the ultimate authority in a time Washington has consumed all means of preserving the position of Israel, and consumed the means of weakening the common enemies’ alliance between America and Israel, so it found the compulsory corridor to reduce the losses by engaging within negotiating agreement with Iran, and admitting of the return of Syria and the position of Russia. This American Israeli separation has mutual interests; because Benjamin Netanyahu has said before the AIPAC that “The Americas are seeking for their security, while Israel is worried about its existence” this separation will be wider when the new American policies go into effect, and when their consequences and their implications emerge.
The timing of this resolution has been issued, while Israel is not only in its most vulnerable political moments, but also in its weakest military moments, especially after the consequences of the amendment of the engagement’s rules between Israel and the resistance since Al Quneitra process, and what it got of an attraction of the deterrent ability of the resistance, in addition to the processes of the Syrian army at the Southern of Syria, where it attacks the strongholds of Al Nosrah Front, and the Syrian Lahd army under the sight of Israel without daring to do anything.
The timing of issuing this resolution at the eve of the Israeli elections, grants it the cleverness of the tactic timing. May the Palestinians will succeed this time in making use of this Israeli contradictions, and affect their paths and their confused elements, after Netanyahu had returned empty-handed from Washington.
To arrive late, better than never, this time is to support the Palestinian leadership to continue with the procedures of deepening the Palestinian national option towards more of unity and engagement in the conflict against the occupation.
Translated by Lina Shehadeh,
2015-03-08 | عدد القراءات 1568
