Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S
An opened letter to the President Al Sheikh Hassan Rouhani
Attitudes are not in their places and time....& snipers are capturing them
Written by Nasser Kandil,
I am not in need to show the history of my supportive attitude of the Islamic Revolution in Iran before and after its victory, especially when this Republic was immature, and under the sight of targeting during its war with Iraq, and under an American instigation and Gulf’s finance. I was among those who were exposed to spend their lives cost of their attitudes for many times, because of our adherence of the vision that Iran the Revolution is not a strategic change in the map of the region only, but also in the world, and a starting new dawn for a more balanced world, for a securer region, and for more independency and freedom. Palestine is always a dream that is going to be true.
This speech is not to discuss the credibility of Iran which is shown through the sacrifices and is proven through the biography, the depth of visions and options, and the greatness of the issue, it is a credibility that I realized since my first readings of articles and lectures of Al Imam Al Khomeini God’s mercy be upon him, and our meeting in 1980, and since my introducing closely to the leaders of the revolution, in their forefront Al Imam Ali Khamenei, who whenever the conflict progresses with the American monster in the region in favor of the resistance, the skills of his strategic mind, the stability of Palestine position, and the choice of resistance have been shown in his visions and considerations, in addition to his moral superiority, and his steadfastness towards a human case in which there is no place for sectarian, doctrinal, national, regional, and ethnic strife.
Our experience as Lebanese during the resistance and what Iran has granted without return. And while it supports Lebanon to have pride, dignity, sovereignty, and land, it was receiving the accusation’s arrows, that it is not a resistance but mere Iranian paper for negotiation. Despite the liberation of the South in the year 2000 and without changing the balance of Iran’s relationship with the West, the accusation remains unabated; it targeted the resistance and tries to affect the credibility of Iran.
After the World War has blown up in Syria, it was clear that the sacrifices and the contributions which Iran has presented, and which were mixed with blood repeatedly were the most important expression about the stable view of Iran about the importance of linking between the chain of the resistance’s alliance, and about the strategic depth of understanding of how the allies are winning through themselves and for themselves. Thus the sacrifices will be free, unconditioned, and without aspirating for a special authority at the account of the other ally which supports and scarifies, as a result the victory of any ally will be a common victory in its outcomes. So it is important for every ally to enhance its position in the equations which concern it and affect its regional security, taking into consideration every change in the powers’ balances, and its role. The war of July was a victory for the Lebanese resistance with an unlimited and unconditional support from Syria and Iran, and without guaranteeing the victory, but to prevent the risk of defeat and its consequences, but when the victory was achieved, it is normal that Syria and Iran are partners in the returns of the victory, and that every one of them must have a position in the regional and international equations , moreover it was normal that Russia found an international shift in the victory, while Venezuela Hugo Chavez saw it a new starting in the freedom way.
Today Iran represents the international ascending power, and the only legitimate representative of the East’s people who are eager to get rid of the dependence, the domination’s projects and collapsing the wars of terrorism, tribalism, the sectarian strives, and approaching towards Palestine. Now it is approaching to attain the outcomes of the legendary steadfastness that lasted for decades in which it presented serious sacrifices, and in which the Iranian people have bear a lot of difficulties. The most important victory is not to lose the identity of the victory itself, but just to remain a victory against the tyrants, the one that achieves the dreams of freeing of the foreign domination, and opens the way of freedom towards Palestine, the way of unity and the rapprochement between the people of the region, its sects, and creeds. In this way the victory will not turn into groups of victories which are competing about identifying the identity. The one who sees the victory as we see, is opposed by who puts the victory within factional, sectarian, national, or ideological term against different identities of region’s people and partners of war and victory and against the same enemies.
We believe that the victory which Al Sayyed Hassan Nasrollah has gave to his Lebanese opponents in order to join him in the celebration is a part of the victory which Iran will give to Palestine and the people of the region, in their different sects, creeds, and nationalisms, and will ask them to join it as a partner. For this reason we ask the Iranian leadership and the President Al Sheikh Hassan Rouhani, because this stage is critical and the playing with the feelings and emotions will increase the ambushing, we are not in need of offering freely a word here and there to the apprentices and hunters, although we know and believe that these words do not express the essence of the Iranian attitude or maybe have been deducted from their contexts, but the strife media is arousing clamor all along the hour about the announcement of emerging Persia Empire and its capital Baghdad, and about Syria which was almost about admitting of the defeat but Iran has liberated it, in addition to the words attributed to important officials and consultants in Iran, But at the same time, we do not mention the words that Iran becomes in the Mediterranean, and the Strait of Bab Al Mandeb, because it is the speech in its place, and which every resister rejoices to heat it and repeats it proudly.
From a one who wants to express his interest, knows the accuracy of the informative levity, and the risk of facilitating the malicious employment in the critical moments, that affects the public opinion. For example while the tribes of Iraq which the American and the Saudi have bet on them, responded to the General Martin Dempsey which has come to instigate the attitudes against Iran, the tribes’ leaders have applied themselves to defend for the role of Iran and praise its offerings and sacrifices.
The controversial attributed speech will remain temporal compared with the deep attitudes issued by the spiritual and official leaders of Iran, and at their forefront Al Imam Al Sayyed Ali Al Khamenei, however, why should we present free gains for the enemies, and confusion in the spirits and emotions that make the prowlers arising it.
Translated by Lina Shehadeh,
2015-03-14 | عدد القراءات 2243
