Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S
Kerry’s abjection & Netanyahu’s chastity
Written by Nasser Kandil,
Gradually, the haters of Arabs and Lebanese of Syria find themselves in the Israeli trench, despite that this trench is conquered, and despite that there are opportunities for them to stay outside the drowned boat, and there are lifeboats, but little a little the meeting with Israel bcomes no longer mere a harmony of attitudes. Here is the Head of the Israeli intelligence Tamlr Pardo is meeting in Riyadh with his Saudi counterpart Khalid Al Humaidan, the Israeli press wrote about this event as an official event, and not a shy infiltration or reserved one in order to avoid the embarrassment.
Little by little the hostility becomes against the resistance, and consequently caused the hatred against Iran and Syria, more than the hatred against Israel, and the conspiracy against the resistance and its supporters, especially Syria and Iran becomes a matter of declaration publically as a new concept for the national security according to many Arab regimes.
America as the writings of its authors and elites show that neither has any problem with the political regime in Iran and its religious referntiality, nor for its possession the nuclear energy, even if it becomes a military program, nor has a problem with the regional authority of Iran. America has already blessed the nuclear bomb of India and Pakistan, or at least condoned them, while it has already admitted the referential role of Iran in the region during the reign of the Shah, furthermore it has already proposed during its long negotiations with Iran an offer which was formed by Henry Kissinger. Its content is the getting out of the Palestinian issue in return of a nuclear issue and a regional leadership. For them everything against Iran becomes a present as long as Iran is adhering the Palestinian issue, in other words the resistance.
America does not have as its politicians and elites have written against Syria, what is caused a crisis or a conflict, because who boasted of an alliance with Saud Arabia, cannot think of democracy any more, and who protects Israel with Veto as a forefront of its allies, is the last one who can think of the human rights. Abdullah Bin Zayed, Dawood Oglu, Hamad Bin Jassim , and Miguel Angel Moratinos have already carried cautions and offers, their pivot is the Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, whose the hostility towards him constitutes the world war against Syria, and which they have made for it a game entitled a revolution, in order to cover its nakedness, they have brought Al –Qaeda to compensate the Syrians’ lack of support for their revolution. The warnings said that the President Al-Assad has put himself and his regime under the attack because he transcended the red lines by providing the qualitative balance-breaker arms for the resistance. And that he could have the economical and political support, a peaceful solution for the Heights of Golan, a distinguished Arab rank, and guarantees for not interfering into his regime, and even if he becomes a king and his family’s name becomes the name of his country as in Saudi Arabia, only if he sticks to moderation in his dealing with the resistance.
Maybe in Syria and Iran there are many things worth the objection, but neither America nor its allies in Turkey, the West, and the Arab would have brought the hostility towards them, except for the American decision about targeting the arms against them. America has not done such a thing, but only for their locations and attitudes towards the conflict with Israel.
On the other hand, there is nothing that justifies the hostility against America according to any Arab, and furthermore considering it an enemy of the Arabs, only of its blind adopting of the Israeli policies, and defending for it in a way that exceeds the American considerations of interest. Thus the projects of the American domination become an engagement of interests with independent regimes when these regimes exist, like Cuba. But on the other hand this American domination does not accept even its successive regimes, until they pay the cost of the commitment of Israel’s security. It does not matter whether this regime was secular or religious, royal or republican, since the place is reserved for the Muslim Brotherhood, if they committed to Israel’s security, whether in Egypt, Tunisia or any other place, the seculars of Tunisia are spending their blood because they have committed to the choice of the resistance.
When it becomes clear that Iran and Syria are under the target because they adopted the resistance, and when it becomes clear that America is worth the hostility of the Arabs because it supports Israel, then in one moment the interests change, so this reveals that America is unable to proceed with its payment to Israel, after it had got older and become crippled needing for one who can feed and protect it. Most of that it boasts of itself and wants to dictate the policies, but at the same time the interests seem that they change, so America discovers that it is unable to continue the hostility against Iran, and the break off and the war against Syria, so Israel irritates and becomes angry, and for that it adopts Al Nosrah front, exactly as it adopted the army of the agent Antoine Lahd in the South of Lebanon during the occupation, so the interests change, and the elites of Israel are thinking of dismissing Benjamin Netanyahu, because he has spoiled the last reasons of Israel’s strength which is its relationship with America, so some Lebanese and Arabs become more sticking to Netanyahu rather than the Israelis themselves, and everything becomes clear and above the level of awareness of the human minds.
The logo of some Lebanese and Arabs becomes no for John Kerry’s abjection, and yes for Netanyahu’s chastity, so what will we say?
We will say let the dead bury their murdered, since the game is over, wailing and moaning will not change anything , so let the mourners scream, because everything has been settled.
Translated by Lina Shehadeh,
2015-03-18 | عدد القراءات 1904
