Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S
Hammond, Saud, Fabius, Suleiman, Al-Siniora, and Jumablatt ….by accident?
Written by Nasser Kandil,
In one day, many crosswords puzzle of different resources and from different places have been uttered. The Prime Minister Fouad Al-Siniora has stood testifying before the International Court, but this was not selective as a testimony. According to him, the government of 1997 has become in 2007, and in 2007 the Prime Minister Rafik Al-Hariri has visited the President Hafez Al-Assad, but both them have died before 2007, and no one of the judges has stood correcting. In the minutes of the court has been recorded that the date 2007 is the date of the meeting between the two deceased, where they discussed the constitution of the government in Lebanon. The name of the Major General Ghazi Kanaan has been missed too; it became after consideration Abou Yarob, and not Abou Yaqoub. When Al-Siniora has been asked about the Syrian role in the elections of 2000, if they were by the Major General Ghazi Kanaan or the Major General Rustom Ghazali?, he took time to answer, then he expressed that maybe Kanaan or Ghazali, but certainly one of them. Moreover, regarding the meeting between the President Hafez Al –Assad and the Prime Minister Rafik Al-Hariri in the year 2007, it was according to Al-Siniora the determination of the share of Al-Hariri between three ministers only, he has chosen the Ministers Bahij Tabbara, Samir Al Jisr, and Fouad Al-Siniora. But when he asked about the Minister Bassem El Sabeh, he said” It seemed that the agreement has allowed Al-Hariri to have four ministers rather than three ones, I have made a mistake.
Al-Siniora has made a mistake, when he honored me when he wanted to get rid of me by saying” that Syria has chosen me, because I was a better one who can represent it from its point of view and according to many Lebanese”, but he has made a mistake in the realities in explaining my presence in the list of the Prime Minister Al-Hariri rather than the student of Al-Siniora as Ghazi Yousef has described it, and that was the reason for him to withdraw his candidacy from the elections of 2000. Furthermore, he said that the imposition of my election on the Prime Minister Al-Hariri was the reason. He, the Court, and its occupied judges in the parliamentary details have ignored that there was a seat in the list of the President Nabih Berri for the South, for which the sister of the Prime Minister Al-Hariri Bahiya Al-Hariri was standing for the election, in return, the President Nabih Berri has to nominate a candidate in the list of the Prime Minister Al-Hariri for Beirut. Therefore if there was a request or a Syrian preference that it has to be from the President Berri rather than from the Prime Minister Al-Hariri, Thus it was neither a concern of the Prime Minister Al-Hariri nor of Al-Siniora, and nor his student surely and certainly.
The Syrian intervention in the financial issue was the following title of Al-Siniora’s reformative testimony, he said that there was not an intervention, but that was opposite to the saying that the Syrians were interfering in everything in the country, while everything which has value at the end is money, so the speech of Al-Siniora has confuted what he and his team have said about spoils which Syria has achieved on the expense of Lebanon, so the mission of Syria was to manage the balances of the tribalism conflicts between the princes of the Lebanese sects, while the genius of Al-Siniora has led to accuse Syria of disabling the reformist plans. But what were the reformist plans? Al-Siniora has said that its center is the privatization, which means buying the country and its possessions which he has named it in a mollified language. “The participation of the private sector”, but he did not say neither that among these participations was preventing his pursuance on charges of corruption, and the abuse of the public money in the incineration of the wastes of Borj Hammoud, nor he said that he is repeating now the same thing in his reformist policy without a Syrian presence in Lebanon, its title is eleven billion dollars that are lost and no one knows its fate, but he bears personally its responsibility, and he and his block are linking the passage of every public budget by forgiving it or ignoring its investigation.
The most important is that Al-Siniora has been called to witness just in order to occupy the platform in media to attack Syria, its president and the resistance and its weapons in a hostile language, but there is no need to remind of it.
In the same night the former President Michel Suleiman has been displayed to the Lebanese in a way that his media personnel have not advised him that it does not suit for a former army commander or a former President of the Republic to talk about the apricot juice, domestic soap and apricot jam, and to attack the resistance, Syria, its president, and its army, forgetting that the self-distance which he boasted that it was one of his important achievements, has called him to stop the protest against who supports Syria, its president and its army.
By the way Charles De Gaulle will commit suicide while he is in his grave out of the military equation of the General Suleiman, because he has triumphed over Fascism which the President Al-Assad has fought its sister in Syria, with victims that amounted more than half a million, while De Gaulle according to General Suleiman has triumphed over his people with half million victims. In addition Eisenhower will commit suicide out of one equation of Suleiman’s military ones, which has brought down as an equation of the army, people and resistance. Because the resistance has fought the terrorism outside the borders of Lebanon as Eisenhower has done outside the borders of his country, and attacked the coming threat.
The morning, noon, and the afternoon of Al-Siniora’s testimony have been completed with the statements of the Deputy Walid Jumblatt, the Foreign Minister of Britain, and the Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia, with one title is the attacking the President Bashar Al-Assad.
The timing was not related to what is going on in Syria, and there is nothing new that can be explained, moreover there is nothing new in the case of the Prime Minister Al-Hariri. The reason was just the statement of John Kerry about the negotiation personally with the President Bashar Al-Assad.
They responded to Kerry and they created for him obstacles, so let Kerry defends for his negotiations. The President Al-Assad is interested in the deeds rather than in the speech.
According to deeds, the Foreign Minister of Britain is responsible for three thousands fighters of ISIS, so he has to think about them after their imminent return to Britain. Jumblatt has deeds for after the year 2016, including the rank of Syria and Iran, and maybe the self-distance of the responsibility or as he called it the stepping down. While Saud Al-Faisal is facing Yemen so let him act if he can, Al-Siniora has to prepare himself for the budget of 2016, where neither the postponing nor the bargain on eleven billion dollars will benefit, while the former President has missed the time of acting, therefore, the one who is refused to retire and nothing left for him just the words is excused.
Translated by Lina Shehadeh,
2015-03-24 | عدد القراءات 2256
