Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S
Netanyahu has talked…..Did Al-Mashnouk hear?
Written by Nasser Kandil,
The spokesman of the Israeli government Ofir Jendlaman has revealed that Benjamin Netanyahu has informed the American President Barak Obama on the phone his strong objection for the agreement’s framework, which was reached between Iran and the group of "5+1" which includes the six major countries concerning Tehran’s Nuclear Program, he expresses that “this agreement constitutes a serious threat against Israel and the World.” He has added that “Netanyahu has pointed out that such of an agreement that based on this framework is threatening the survival of Israel. Just two days ago Iran has said that the destruction of Israel is nonnegotiable, considering that “This agreement will legitimize the Iranian nuclear program, will enhance the Iranian economy, in addition it will increase the Iranian aggression and the terrorism in all over the Middle East and outside it.
Benjamin Netanyahu has said something similar in the presence of the French President Francois Hollande two year ago, after Hollande had expressed fiery declarations against the presented agreement with Iran. He concluded that France will undertake that, it will not permit to sign any agreement with Iran except after the assertion that it does not possess a nuclear bomb. Netanyahu has replied “thank for all the friends of Israel for their reassurances and commitments, but we wonder how we become in this time in which the friends of Israel accept from the Great Powers to grant country a discharge, and accept its integration within the international community, while it publically says that it will not change its attitude, that calls for the destruction of Israel, he cited that “I hoped that I heard a commitment from anyone for not accepting to sign any agreement with Iran as long as it does not change its attitude towards Israel”.
Israel is not worried about the Iranian nuclear program but the normalization of the West’s relations with Iran without changing its attitude towards Israel and the supporting of Iran of the resistance movements especially Hezbollah, which becomes the source of anxiety and the daily headache for Israel, For that it supported the war against Yemen with all its efforts, because the obsession of fear pushes it to think that the Front of Yemen will be one of the termination lines against Israel, and that the missiles of the resistance will surround it in any coming war. Moreover the speech of the Foreign Minister Mansour Hadi has not calmed down its thirst for revenge that the missiles which are worried Israel from Al Hodeida have been destructed by the Saudi aerial raids, but even the Israeli Seventh Channel has shown that the Israelis have insisted on airy bombing Al Hodeida, in order to ensure themselves that the mission has been completed.
Netanyahu said during his discussion with Obama that “the terrorism will prevail in the region”, he means the resistance which is associated with Hezbollah, not with Al-Qaeda branches which the Israeli allies with in its war against Syria, either directly through Al Nosrah Front which the Aggression War Minister Moshe Yaalon has described it with a reliable ally, alluding to establish a security belt in Golan Heights that is similar to the belt of Antoine Lahd in the South of Lebanon, or indirectly through ISIS the ally across Turkey and Qatar, publically the fear is when Iran’s renaissance will grant further support for the resistance especially Hezbollah.
Israel is expecting an open alliance for itself with the Arab governments which have hostility towards Iran, after the sectarian backgrounds had succeeded in facilitating the prevalence of a relation with Israel as the Hebrew newspapers have shown. Therefore, the hostility towards the resistance becomes a common divisor with the alliance led by Saudi Arabia.
The Lebanese Minister of Interior Nuhad Al- Mashnouk has renewed his fear that lifting the sanctions will lead for more funds and resources from the Iranian government, and this in return will increase its involvement and its domination in the region, it means the Iranian behavior in the region from Syria to Iraq and Yemen in exclusion of Lebanon, pointing that Lebanon is not a part of the Iranian show, because the Iranian show in Lebanon has achieved its results, and it is in no need for more shows.
He thought that “If there will be a final American Iranian agreement that ensures the security of Israel, then it is good for Lebanon because in this case it will omit this paper from the Lebanese discussion, and the Lebanese country will be the only concerned party, so this will end the discussion about the justifications of the weapons of Hezbollah, but I cannot see a final agreement.”
He added” If there will not be a nuclear agreement then there will be security explosions and a more Iranian daring to act in all the countries that it works in, either in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, and maybe other countries such as Bahrain. The initial agreement may help in continuing the truce, or at least keeps the situation as it is now, because my speech based on unraveling the negotiations. But I will not think of any probability till after June”
It is enough sometimes to read without comment, and to try a mental exercise that inserts a name from our memory into reality, in order for its owner to know what to do.
Translated by Lina Shehadeh,
2015-04-05 | عدد القراءات 2002
