Al-Nusra, ISIS, Druze, and the American Israeli considerations

Dotting the I’S & Crossing the T’S   

Al-Nusra, ISIS, Druze, and the American Israeli considerations

Written by Nasser Kandil,

In the stages of the American ascending as a force of expansion and influence, Al-Qaeda Organization was an attrition force against the prominent opponent; the Soviet Union, in a preparation to attack it without considering a substitute for Al-Qaeda’s services despite the declarations of its leaders that they are the owners of the Islamic project that fights the Communists, and allied with the liberal West which does not affect the Islamic rites as the Communists do. In return Israel tried to play on the position of the Unitarian Druze in Lebanon and Syria hoping to use them in its project as a tool for dismantling the national unity of the two entities, and hit the renaissance project that is prepared to fight it, although that the leaders who accepted the Israeli proposal, said that they have fed up with that all the sectarian components control their future, security, and their stability and that they allied with worried religious minority like them seeking for an independent entity, It was not into the accounts of Israel to think in case it succeeds, how to grant rewards for the participants in its civil strife project.

Al-Qaeda leaders have fallen into the American entanglement, and accepted to be used by the Americans, the war of Afghanistan has ended with the defeat of the Soviet Union, thus the Americans have behaved as winners who have ended a battle but continue the war, till the Soviet Union was collapsed and disintegrated, but Al-Qaeda has not been rewarded for its role, but Washington has hold the control of the rule in Afghanistan for those who saw them closer to it, while the leaders of the Unitarian Druze in Lebanon and Syria have alerted to the risk of the Israeli project, so they refused to deal with it, even they did not welcome the promoters and the messengers of it, on the contrary they insisted on adhering a leading role in their nationalism and Arabism, even when the civil war has taken place in Lebanon, and some have tried to promote the idea of the Druze state, the Lebanese and the Syrian demographic geographical entanglement, in addition to the political, security, and military independence were sufficient reasons for the fall of that project.

With the decline of the American and the Israeli projects and the erosion of the offensive energy for each one of them in the first decade of this century, and the heading towards Syria with all the Saudi Turkish capacities in addition to American Israeli plan that allows to barter and give this alliance the capacities of the region as a partner and an agent in exchange of causing the defeat to the resistance alliance, which is composed of the triangle Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah, but the failure was not expected, because of the magnitude of what they have spent of potentials in order to win this war, but after the failure the Americans returned and betted on Al-Qaeda Organization as an attrition force to achieve goals repeatedly to what has happened in Afghanistan. So the Israelis return to the theory of hiding behind the walls which this time becomes demography not mere reinforced concrete as the situation around Jerusalem.

The American attrition wars have failed because of Al-Qaeda, and the plans of the Israeli security zone have failed on borders either by Al-Nusra Front or by tampering the Druze component and its employment. The American has confronted the Syrian steadfastness, which has not taken into consideration, and an adhering of the allies which surpassed the expectation. While Israel has collided with the deterrence balance which the resistance has put it against it, so the Americans have retreated in the last quarter before the end of the available negotiating time in the Iranian nuclear program, and after the Turkish, Saudi, and Israeli retrogression in each issue and field to the extent of collaborating in retail with Al-Qaeda Organization under the title of facilitating the expansion of Al-Nusra in the Southern and Northern of Syria in exchange of fighting Hezbollah and defeating it in Al-Qalamoun, and to collaborate with ISIS by facilitating the entrance of its troops to Al-Ramadi and Palmyra in exchange of the arrival to Al-Qalamoun and the pledge to fight Hezbollah. In return after Israel had ensured of the impossibility of changing the equations it proposed managing the relationship between the Druze component and Al-Nusra to reconciliation and to non-collision in exchange of neutralizing Sweida in the Syrian military and political geography. The intention here is to disrupt the movement of the Syrian army in it, from it, and towards it.
 

ISIS failed after Al Nusra had failed in Al-Qalamoun battles and has been fallen by America once again, and the resistance has emerged this time as an international superpower and in return was the American resounding failure. Therefore the massacres against the Unitarian Druze in the village of Qalb Lozeh in the countryside of Idlib have been taken place by Al Nusra on one hand, and the absolute majority of the unitary movement among Druze on the other hand, and despite the Israeli intrigues and Jumblatt’s incitement to resolve once again the identity of the Mountain which named Jabal Al-Arab, and which was always a site of championships-making in the Independence wars,  have prevented the fall of Jabal Al Arab at the hands of the Israeli and Al Nusra, so it wins to itself, its nationalism, its Arabism and the unity of Syria and the rank of its army.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

 

 

 

 

2015-06-12 | عدد القراءات 1916