• Since the war of the Americans to occupy Iraq, Washington has succeeded in promoting the premise about the right of a foreign country to talk about the eligibility of the departure of a ruler who challenges it in his policies, because it is the solution for the stability of that country without linking that with the people’s will.
•  In all the wars which the popular resistances have waged against the American occupation, the high level of the solidarity with it, was the call of their rights in determining their fate, and determining the system of rule they want, while it is clear that the ruler is mere a traitor set by the occupation
• The Americans have repeated their actions in Libya.
• What the rebels of the Arab Spring have done, and have met the applause is a visual trick to promote the game of intervention in nominating rulers and deposition rulers away from the people, while the right is to call for fair elections and guarantees for their fairness.
• Saudi Arabia is a regime without constitution or elections; it says who will depart and who will remain in the name of democracy.
• The American, French, Turkish, and the Saudi are repeating rudely that there is no future for the Syrian President in his country,
• The only response which must be repeated and entrenched to confirm the exclusive  rights of the people is by nominating their rulers by the election only, this was the response of the Russian President Vladimir Putin, Are they Syrians to decide who will rule Syria?

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2015-10-16 | عدد القراءات 1750