Nasser Kandil wrote: Is it the tyranny of Erdogan?

Some will engage in boasting of the electoral victory of Erdogan, and the victory of confuting the expectations of his failure including our expectations.
We will let them enjoy.
The easiest way is that the analysis shows all the probabilities, so neither be wrong nor be right nor claims that the events have occurred as the expectations.
The astrology is not our concern, and the stardom is not our interest.
The doctor diagnoses the situation, and when something occurs surprisingly, he says that our analysis is not right, there are some new symptoms that have emerged, so he accelerates to go along with what has happened and what will happen.
The case’s people are neither amateurs of entertainments in cocks struggles, nor gamblers betting on horses.
Erdogan has won by surprise that neither the West media nor the East nor the Turks nor the polls have expected it, his party moreover did not deny that it was a surprise, so is his tyranny?
The surprise means a big and a rapid change, thus it is not a popular change but a political one.
It means a big deal in which major powers participated, in addition to a ready voting bloc that has been packed for it.
Gulen the splinter of Erdogan was the reason of the June’s lose and October’s winning, in both times due to an American decision.
Erdogan has preferred the political defeat from the electoral one, so he pledges to the Americans the discipline into Vienna’s understandings towards Syria, the closure of borders and accepting the Kurds as political partners.