- Al-Ibrahimi has failed to subdue Syria and its president to surrender by the force of threat of invasion, his mission has ended practically with the return of the fleets.
- When De Mistura was assigned, his mission was the starting from the admission of the remaining of the Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, but by promoting a new formation of the country that is based on the sectarian sharing, which De Mistura has named it the inspiring Lebanese example.
- Vienna’s statement has mourned the formation, and has announced the victory of Syria by imposing the formula of the unified secular country.
- Al-Ibrahim and De Mistura have played the melody of a transitional governing body.
- Vienna’s statement has mourned the project in favor of a country headed by Al-Assad and which its partnership government is a priority, and in which the participating opposition breaks its relationships with Al-Nusra Front and considers its priority the war on the terrorism and not overthrowing the regime, so it involved in the requirements of this war.
- The opposition which has an armed force can be a part of a field cooperation formula with the Syrian army in the war on terrorism, and a part of the government of unity politically.
- De Mistura is talking about ceasing fire and a dialogue with the opposition.
- What is needed is a UN Envoy that can verify the regional commitment of stopping the bet on terrorism by stopping the arming and financing, and can separate the opposition from the terrorism according to Vienna’s path.
Translated by Lina Shehadeh,
2015-11-06 | عدد القراءات 1601