• Since the beginnings, the issue was to answer the question what is the opposition in Syria and what is the terrorism? , and since the beginnings the policy of Washington  was based on showing all the terrorist organizations are peaceful opposition which was obliged to hold arms, and maybe it has committed a terrorist acts.

• Since the beginnings in 2012 and during the mission of the UN Envoy Kofi Anan, the American Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said at the spokesman of its President Barack Obama that the opposition must refuse to lay down its weapons, and must refuse the calls of dialogue. She said about the terrorists which were brought to Syria that they were provoked by the processes of suppressing “the revolution” so they came to support “the people” Thus “An accidental meeting may be better than a date”, by accident “Al-Nusra Front” becomes a branch of Al-Qaeda Organization !

•  The balances have changed, so Washington and its allies accepted to admit of the presence of terrorism despite their classifying Al-Nusra as a terrorist organization that represents Al-Qaeda, but they refused to make it a target of their announced war, by the name of the war on terrorism. Petraeus as Robert Ford have declared that Al-Nusra is an allied project that has the support of America’s allies and their silence.

• The balances have changed more and the war against Al-Nusra has flown out of Washington’s control, so the distinction between the opposition and the terrorism becomes necessary.

•  It is a start of a turning point in the war.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2015-11-07 | عدد القراءات 1720