• Do the ones who have nominated Suleiman Franjieh for presidency have the right to blame him if he was keen of his relationship with his allies, especially those whose their stability has paved the way for his nomination, and who are keen on their relationships with their allies who dedicate themselves to sabotage all the understandings?
• Everyone knows that the thinking of Franjieh has not occurred only because the General Michael Aoun is a powerful candidate accompanied with a strong support represented by Hezbollah, and because Franjieh who is their closer ally has been chosen as a candidate of a settlement.
• If Franjieh has to thank anyone for his nomination, he must thank Aoun and Hezbollah.
• The nomination of Franjieh is continuous and will continue till Aoun arrives to presidency under the title “what was the outcome of patience and steadfastness which is the nomination of Franjieh, will lead to more patience and steadfastness which means the acceptance of Aoun”, or till Aoun arrives to a settlement that ensures his nomination of Franjieh instead of him under the equation of “ if the deal with Franjieh is easier, then what is needed is the following and then it is determined what is needed”.
• What is important is that the team which faces Syria and the resistance has announced its failure, and has accepted the nomination of a president from the choice of Syria and the resistance.
• The presidential alternatives have fallen and the choices become between Aoun and Franjieh.
• Patience, steadfastness, the bilateral, and the resistance are the way to victory.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2015-12-10 | عدد القراءات 1758