• The Israelis bet on that the assassination of the leader the example Samir Al-Kuntar will change the track of the Israeli isolation through what the response process will provide of escalation that is needed by Israel to link its position with the new tracks of the region.
• The Israelis bet on that targeting a figure such as Samir Al-Kuntar will affect the resistance of excitement, and will lure it to immediate response, and within this Israeli alert the immediate response will be local and will focus on targeting the Israel exterior with loses that justify more powerful Israeli responses and response to the response, and thus it will lead to an escalation that allows the entry of the region in the tense circle which will lure international interventions that allow for presenting solutions as generalizing and expanding the range of the effects of the resolution 1701 to contain the Southern of Lebanon and Golan.
• The resistance is decisive concerning the response.
• The resistance is cling to a response that is convenient with its interest, its timing, and the magnitude of the deterrence’s balance which it keeps.
• The Resistance will not grant Israel the opportunity of searching for an escalation though which it manipulates to achieve an equation of protection.
• The resistance puts the principle and keeps the timing, the way, the place, as well as the surprise as a condition to win, even if the response is delayed or preceded or if it is on the fighting lines or outside them.
• Al Sayyed has proceeded slowly in his words, their clarity, and their ambiguity in a way that confuses the enemy.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2015-12-22 | عدد القراءات 1754