Written by Nasser Kandil,

Many of those who constitute a part of the media process which is funded by Saudi Arabia or which affiliated by the Israeli or the Turkish system, and those who waged a war of presence to break the nuclear understanding between the Western countries and Iran like to imagine the understanding and its steadfastness and the starting of its effects which are related to the obligations of the West toward Iran as  mere technical agreement, that is less than an agreement of joining the World Trade Organization and  the fulfill of its conditions, knowing that a major important country such as China did not have the opportunity of joining the World Trade Organization without opening the Israeli embassy in Beijing after a break of long decades.

It is known that the Iranian nuclear program is a sensitive and deliberated issue at the same time, If Iran was not Iran which we knew its policies especially which are related to the position toward Israel, then the West would tolerate with its nuclear program, this West was coexisting with the possessing of a country such as Pakistan of a nuclear missile system which it wants in its confronting with India, and does not find in it a danger against the international peace and security in contrast to its position against Iran which possesses the peaceful nuclear energy, while the sensitivity of the Iranian nuclear program comes from the fact that Iran is the country which insists on following the path of independence apart from the West, and building its own project of development which records a superiority in the fields of science and technologies and which achieves within its economic subjective independence under the siege what causes the failure of the hopes of weakening it or causing its fall as a rising power.

The West at its forefront Washington has waged its war on the Iranian nuclear program betting on the role of the sanctions in frustrating it either by preventing the necessary financial surplus of the resources to complete it, or by depriving Iran from importing the techniques with it needs in order to go on within possessing the nuclear techniques, moreover considering the success in the sanctions’ system to perform its duties a way to submit Iran and to weakening it after breaking its prestige, humiliating it politically, and impoverishing it financially, in other words, getting through the nuclear program means affecting it as a technical modern advanced issue, and a passage to others through the gates of the progress and the technological independence, as it is a waste of the human and material resources which have been spent for the success for that issue without reaching  the desired results, and a frustration for many technical projects as well as it is a hit against the political will which aims to present an independent viable example,  and a confirmation of its ability to provide the reasons of steadfastness and protection and later the success.

Within the Western and the American endeavor in particular for besieging Iran and targeting its nuclear program, the issues of the Middle East were strongly present before the Syrian crisis and during it they were more powerful, the West at its forefront Washington was not lenient with those who do not  have a doctrinal serious threat against Israel or those who do not adopt liberal policies that present the support to the popular opposition forces which have a demographic depth in the Gulf countries, or those who do not compete Turkey on the position of the rising country in the Islamic World through an attractive example. When Egypt wanted a distinguished relationship with Washington at the era of Anwar Al-Sadat it was treated with one answer, the road is passed by Tel Aviv, Riyadh, and Ankara, and the normalization of the relationships with this triangle in order to enter the American paradise. What Iran knew was a repetition to a large extent to what the experience of Gamal Abdul Nasser has witnessed, that experience met the Iranian position in the hostility against Israel and competing Turkey on the leading example of the Islamic World and it sponsoring the opposition forces in the Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula

The West negotiations about the Iranian nuclear program took into consideration their political agenda and what it included of conditions, where every round of negotiation stopped at this point and then was resumed, Iran has achieved further technological progress in its nuclear accomplishments, While Washington arrived at the edge of the abyss, it has failed in alienating Iran away from its program under the plea of the lack of resources, or the loss of the brains to develop the national alternatives of the techniques which the sanctions on Iran have banned  the opportunity of regaining them. Iran has ascended the ladder of the nuclear scientific progress, till it completed the full technical session; it ascended that ladder till its end, thus the gate of the transition into the military production has become under its control whenever it decides. The confrontation became between the limited choices, going to war that allows the production of a bomb or closing the negotiation, and a high enrichment and storing in order to reach to the necessary quantity for a bomb or more or to reach to an understanding. The pressures have failed in imposing any Iranian abandonment of the initiative positions which restrict the position of Iran in the political geography of the Middle East especially toward the Israeli Saudi and Turkish trinity.

The peak of the war which Washington has waged on Syria with all its allies in the world and the region intersected with the peak of war which it waged on the front of the Iranian nuclear program through negotiations and sanctions, the two wars are growing from each other, as if a winning in a front causes the approach of the victory’ hour in the other front, in other words, the falling of Syria weakens the geo-strategic status of Iran and affects it seriously, that facilitates the continuation of its negotiation from a position of strength and gives the sanctions another meaning, the progress in the war on the nuclear program facilitates the opportunities of causing the fall of Syria, because Iran and the resistance are two main allies in making the steadfastness of Syria. The outcome of the two wars is the steadfastness of Syria and the steadfastness of Iran, Russia is present in the two wars as a partner in making the steadfastness and turning the scale of the political solutions till was the signing on the understanding and the readiness of the Russian American understanding about Syria.

What was left was the Saudi Turkish Israeli denial till the last quarter of lifting the sanctions, the attempts of sabotage and the provocation continue to bomb the region in order to disrupt the effects of the understanding which its last triangle was the assassination of the Russian pilot by the Turkish air force, the assassination of the martyr Samir Al-Kuntar, and the assassination of Sheikh Nimr Al-Nimr by Saudi Arabia, these three assassinations have one mission is to transfer the region into an atmosphere of escalation, tension and confrontations which are out of control, thus Iran remains face-to-face with the West, therefore everything that was built in the understanding will fall and break down.

Today Iran officially enters the phase of harvest its steadfastness and its success, it is right to celebrate its victory, but most importantly is that the region celebrates the end of the Israeli Saudi Ottoman era as titles of the American hegemony. It is the first time when Washington finds itself obliged to sign and apply an understanding of that importance with a country in the Middle East without the knowing of Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey and contrary to their will.

It is a bigger shift than was suggested and includes more than analyses. Today a new East is born and who observes the Syrian scene and tomorrow the Lebanese scene along with the Yemeni and the Iraqi scenes will discover what this new East means.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2016-01-18 | عدد القراءات 1791