• Many Syrians think about the elections of the parliament after nearly a month as a constitutional maturity that must be accomplished in order to ensure the sovereignty dimension in forming the institutions of the country and that is true.
• It is not true to surrender to the idea that the electoral competition will not be settled unless the opposition especially that is supported by the abroad participates in the elections within the concept of the settlement, because in this case it is a free gift for the opposition as a condition of democracy.
• Those who are keen on saying that Syria knows how to live its democracy without the opposition that is supported by the abroad are invited to revive the electoral process by setting the elements of life in it through the competition.
• Those who talk about their support of their country and their army, but object the performance of the institutions of the country are invited to wage the elections, to benefit from the opportunities of the electoral campaigns in explaining their positions and proving their reformist seriousness in the attempt to enter the parliament.
• The nomination is due away from the opportunities of wining and loss, because linking the nomination with the ensured winning means the acceptance of undemocratic game, and an abandonment of the criteria of reforming which some criticize the reality under its name.
• The elections are occasion for knowing the serious people in their claim from those who master the sitting in the cafes and just utter their theories.

Translated by LinaShehadeh,

2016-03-06 | عدد القراءات 1967