Nasser Kandil wrote: the opposition is the front of Al Nusra

  • The list of the signatories which appears in the statement that was issued under the name of the armed factions, and which announced the going out of the armistice under the slogan of violations that the country and the army were accused of belongs to the groups of Wahhabism and Turkey.
  • The Northern of Syria which constitutes the arena of the military confrontation in which the truce has failed is a place for the forces which exclusively exist by the Turkish support, there is no sane that can deny the direct Turkish contribution in any escalation or any calming there.
  • It is known that Turkey announces its  attempt to draw a red line around the presence of Al Nusra front in Idlib, Azaz, and Aleppo as a regional barter paper for security and political gains which Turkey wants as an outcome of its role in the war.
  • When Al Nusra Front was excluded of the armistice provisions, neither Turkey nor Saudi Arabia were approvers or comfortable, on the contrary the option of silence remained accompanying the seek for a deal between Al Nusra and what is called as the armed factions to ensure making use of the truce by Al Nusra, and the benefit of Riyadh negotiating group from the claim of its control on the situation there.
  • Al Nusra’s stipulation is that the decision belongs to it, while the coverage is the task of Riyadh’s group. After Palmyra Al Nusra decided to escalate to protect Idlib, therefore Riyadh’s group has undertaken the task of justification.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2016-04-19 | عدد القراءات 1800