• The group of Riyadh is welcoming by the name of the opposition with the sending of two hundred and fifty trainers by the President Barack Obama to prepare groups that are affiliated to the Democratic Forces of Syria which the group of Riyadh is refusing to admit of them or to join them in the negotiating delegation.
• The group of Riyadh knows that what the President Obama announced of his sending of consultants and trainers was not a decision of intervening in Syria against the country and it.
• As the group of Riyadh defends for Al Nusra Front to hide its inability, it praises the decision of Obama to hide its scandal.
• The group of Riyadh knows that neither Al Nusra nor the Democratic forces of Syria, nor the army to overthrow the President in order to welcome this announcement.
• Obama supports the force which is supposed that it competes the group of Riyadh; this proves the lack of confidence and the continuation of the work to create an alternative of
• the sending of Obama of his consultants will change the scene of Syria.
• With the same hypocrisy the group of Riyadh is withdrawing from the negotiations and according to its logic it cannot see the killing continues and keeping in the negotiation as it said, so does the withdrawal stop the killing or increase the escalation?
• If the army was seeking for an escalation and does not want the political solution as the group says, so why it would grant the army the plea to disrupt the negotiation, and if the group of Riyadh is able to resolve so why does it negotiate originally?

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2016-04-26 | عدد القراءات 1989