Written by Nasser Kandil,
It is not possible to restrict the readings which are related to the municipal elections which Lebanon has known so far with the Lebanese forces. The signs which the elections show around the importance and the status and through putting the Lebanese parties in accordance to their magnitudes, either towards what these signs indicate regarding the future of the balances which will rule the coming parliamentary elections and the presidential elections if they would be hold from a new parliament, particularly the results are read by those who are concern about the readiness of the Lebanese background to bear divisions and strives that besiege the resistance, or the degree of street’s vitality which can undertake this task, in contrast to the degree of vitality of the resistance background and its interaction with the political leadership of the resistance and its sticking to it, as well as the degree of the ability of this leadership to manage electoral competitions that require thousands machines, organization, management, and understandings that consume leading, humanitarian, and material capacities that are supposed they were all exhausted in the war in Syria and in what is dedicated to confront the Israeli threat.
Israel accompanied with Saudi Arabia and supported by America are in the process of the detailed reading of the results under an open war on the resistance in all media, financial, and security fields, and maybe as it is said that the drums of the Israeli war are preparing to be knocked soon in order to make use of the consequences of what is going on in the other warfare, which are supposed that their results show a disintegration in the resistance environment, a dismantling of its leaderships, and confusion in this leadership. These are the conditions which Israel betted on to move to the military agenda, it takes into consideration the accounts before involving in this table, so it will not get involved, if it does not make sure of the success and the accuracy of the considerations of the disintegration and the weakness of the resistance as well as the confusion of its leadership on one hand, and the development of the opposed backgrounds that are ready to engage in a direct confrontation with the resistance having the necessary vitality and the enthusiasm to undertake this task.
The elections of Beirut and Bekaa have allowed the recognition of the meaningful important examples in the two concerned parties, in any internal confrontation that can weaken the resistance and pave the way or accompany a coming war in order to measure in a concentrated way the effect of the open war during one year on the resistance background, and to stimulate the environments which were betted on to confront it. The followers of Al Mustaqbal Movement which the capital Beirut constitutes its central arena and the main tangent line between it and the followers of the resistance and its structure, and which was betted on it in bombing a civil strife against the resistance was on a historical test that has shown its inability and its weakness, towards the results which show that the Movement which its representation does not reach 9% of this Beirut background has lost half of its importance and most of its vitality, while the elections of Bekaa where the depth of the popular resistance is, have shown an ability of mobilization that ranged between 50 and 60 % expressing a decisive cohesion with the leadership of the resistance in eighty municipalities of eighty. In so far as the leadership of Al Mustaqbal Movement has been shown confused in managing its battle as well as its alliances, and afraid of the competitions, the leadership of the resistance which is engaged in many battles has shown its ability to provide leading capacities for the elections and mobilizing a group of staff and youths to manage its process and to win in it.
The disparity and the inversion in the incubating background of the resistance opposed by the background which is led by the Prime Minister Saad Al-Hariri on which can be betted for a confrontation that turns into a strife with the resistance says that there is no basis on which can rely on in the surrounding background of Al Mustaqbal Movement to confront the resistance and its background, because the degree of the popular aversion of Al Mustaqbal Movement and its Head is a big ( no ) toward any plan of confrontation which may come into his head or in the head of who bet on his involvement, opposed by the incubating background of the resistance which is getting from it more support, adhesion, adherence to its leadership and its position, and a confidence of its choices, as well as it grants it a remarkable presence.
If the results of the campaign which started from Washington and extended to the Gulf and headed by Saudi Arabia need to be measured to provoke the resistance and its leaderships, and to stimulate the opponent powers and agitate them in preparation for a confrontation that is betted on, waiting for Israeli military action that accumulates these campaigns, then the municipal elections as a means of measuring the results which have presented disappointed outcome would prove that this bet has no horizon, because the Lebanese public is not willing to have hostility toward the resistance, moreover the public of the resistance neither get tired or exhausted, nor the despair has affected it, and every talk about disintegration and disassembly in the bases of this public is nonsense, thus the dreams of the Israeli war will remain postponed so long and the bets of exhaustion, attrition, and siege are not correct.
Translated by Lina Shehadeh,
2016-05-12 | عدد القراءات 2073
