• No one disagrees that Israel has an active participation in the assassination of the martyr the leader Mustafa Badr Al-Din, as no one disagrees on his rank at the resistance and that Israel is bearing the responsibility.
• The partnership or the implementation of Israel of the assassination requires Israeli considerations according to the criteria of the balances, what was settled may lead to confrontation that provokes a war.
• The issue is not that Israel considers this precious hunting deserves a war, but that the assassination was intended to be a part of a war that Israel does not want to postpone its hypothesis for after the war on Syria where it is alone, since it knows the consequences.
• The assassination says that Israel has decided to wage the adventure of going to the coming war before its time, as long as it has partners in the war of Syria, where they wage their war which is different form the war of Israel, so why not to make it one war? 
• Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Al-Qaeda are in the war alliance, they say to Israel if we lose then you will pay the cost, and if we win the victory is for all, while Israel tells them that it is ready for a partnership, provided that if the settlement is decided then it must be applied on all.
• Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Al-Qaeda are the quaternary of the war, but the arena of the decisive war will be Aleppo.

Translated by LinaShehadeh,

2016-05-14 | عدد القراءات 2295