Written by Nasser Kandil,
There are new equations that discuss strategic and political issues in the speech of the Secretary-General of Hezbollah Al Sayyed Hassan Nasrollah, and because he is a politics-maker so revealing equations is not his task,becausesometimes this does harm to them, because the outcomes and the conclusions of politics often need the non- disclosing of justifications,non- explaining them or maybe saying some of them, blocking them or activating them through keeping them secret and leaving them.
It seems that Al SayyedNasrollah who is well-informed about belief, faith and what is based on religion has felt of agony upon mentioning a symbol of the the People of the House [of Prophet], so he decided to avoid the religious symbolism in his political speech to the fullest possible extent. A party as Hezbollah which stems from the religious belief in its cohesion, values, and sacrifices is sure of its existential targeting, but it has a certain decision of waging the confrontation, so it retires from the political to the religious matters to instigate the higher capacities, to mobilize most of the people, and to crowd the lines of confrontation in the fronts, while Al SayyedNasrollah insists on revealing the political meaning of the targeting, to analyze and to confute by politics and to confront by politics towards saying that they do not care about your religion if it loses its political dimension, so pray, fast, put on a veil and make the pilgrimage whenever you want, this does not bother them as long as you do not interfere in the issue of Palestine, this is what Bin Saud do,so they do not bother them, but the issue does not bear this existential danger and this crucial decision of confrontation , and they do not dismiss the magic weapon of " religion" only for accurate and sensitive considerations that are more dangerous than the introductions.
In the speech of Nasrollahand through the extensive explanation of the American plan that aims to weaken the axis of the resistance, it becomes evident that it based on resorting and using a hybrid religious product that was made and programmed for this purpose, for that Nasrollah sees the war in Syria from this perspective, he knows that the competition between the religious and the religious is the goal which grants the American plan the opportunity of wining in the bet, and its turning into a stage of a doctrine versus a doctrine and thus towards the strife which Hezbollah is fighting in the field but not by ignoring, disregarding or turning back, it draws the duel ground which it is sure that it will be the end of its enemies, it is politics, it told them it is not important neither to pray nor to fast nor to put on a veil, just tell us about your position toward Palestine, sanctuaries, and the occupation. It seems that this arena of dueland confrontation which Nasrollah choses for the coming confrontation with all the opponent campaign against the resistance which hides in religion and sectarianism will be accompanied with illuminations that make the evasion from entering to it a semi impossible. Palestine is between you and us, you the bastards; this is the first password of Nasrollah.
The second equation which is resulting from what Al SayyedNarollah has presented about understanding the war in Syria is that it is not a resolving war according to American perspective in order to lead to a decisive victory or possible settlement, but it is a war thatfailed in resolving and thus the choice of settlement has been decided but it is suspended till exhausting the last ability of the groups which were prepared for this war, therefore the war of attrition neither means the illusion of victory, nor the fall of the settlement's choiceaccording to the Americans, but it means that the most important goal of the end of war whetherit is a victory or a settlement is the size of the harm through which it affects the resistance axis and the size of the attrition it achieves, such as how many leaders it kills and how much wills it affects badly, how much capacities it crushes, how it changes cultures, priorities, and options and how it imposes arousing tribalism. This is the profit which Washington wants from an open war and endless account with the resistance axis even if the war stops under any name. This equation dependson two aspects for the confrontation, the first one is the steadfastness then the resilience but under the ceiling of political speech not a religious one, and the second is the preparation for the resolving and the deliberateness in accepting the current settlements which sometimes are a pause for a round of new attrition, it is not important the availability of considerations of changing the equations at the enemy, because the attrition is enough as a goal, and the preparation for resolving means giving the priority in the war considerations to make use of the opportunities of the geographical victory rather than the settlement opportunities, as the situation was before, so the political solution is mere an American coverage to breathtaking toward new attrition round, while ending the wars of attrition only paves the way for the serious political solution.
This reading completes its effects toward the Lebanese interior; it seems that the electoral silence in Beirut is not just a response for the pragmatic considerations that result from the equation of the alliances and their rules and the conditions of interfering in the lists and supporting them, as it is an outcome of a reverse reading of the common which says that the understandings require two wills,while one will is enough to ignite a war, therfore Al Sayyed has put his new equation to deal with the strife as a kind of settlement not as a kind of war, it is an outcome of the convergence of two wills that it is not achieved without their satisfaction, he reveals thatsilence , ignorance, disregarding are tools that can be applied as a plan to terminate the strife, he presents an implicit example for a virtual reading. The participation in supporting a list that competes the list of Al Mustaqbal Movement means giving the platform of escalation to the strife, and the announcement of supporting a competitive list is a strife too, as well as the illusion to the allies to refuse the participation in a list with Al Mustaqbal facilitates the strife, they are willing so why not let them go and let the competitive lists appear, but let us retiresilently and quietly, let us leave the freedom to our voters so most of them will give their votes normally without any directing to the competitive lists which some of them maybe in their essence and their relation are closer politically to Al Mustqabal than the resistance, thus the result will be as it was wonderful, while we will make every effort to manage carefully the contradictions of our public in Bekaa and we will present the example of the cohesion of our popular front and its background and its sticking to its options, thus the message will be no strife, the public of your war is retired, it does not care about your slogans and your soft power wars, while the public of the resistance is alerted, but the sanctions and the blockade are soft power wars that do not affect it.
Translated by LinaShehadeh,
2016-05-14 | عدد القراءات 2095
