The US security institutions feel satisfied with having control by making the presidency restricted between two parties where it is easy to dominate over the decision-makers in them, by sticking to financial and personal issues of the actors in these two parties, which soon would turn into scandals if the involved party rebelled against the institution, thus it would be outside the politics.

The US security institutions direct the swing voting block which decides the small difference between the two candidates, thus the scale turns at its hands, the administration is easy and accustomed to the images of every candidate identified by the media which is controlled by the institutions,and which control as well over the powerful politicians by the power of facilities and making the financial and the personal issues for the media decision-makers.

The close period of the elections is the period of the negotiation which is conducted by the security institutions with the candidates on the details in the agenda of the rule and policies. The wider the difference between the two candidates becomes, the institutions make reasons to narrow the gap by launching investigations or spreading scandals, because the hour of resolving has not come yet, and the two candidates must be weak and in need of the support, as well the swingblock must remainfluctuating of its decision, in this period the companies of poll help in promoting what is needed from them.

What is going on these days is an attrition of the president in order to arrive exhausted.

Translated by LinaShehadeh,

The US security institutions feel satisfied with having control by making the presidency restricted between two parties where it is easy to dominate over the decision-makers in them, by sticking to financial and personal issues of the actors in these two parties, which soon would turn into scandals if the involved party rebelled against the institution, thus it would be outside the politics.

The US security institutions direct the swing voting block which decides the small difference between the two candidates, thus the scale turns at its hands, the administration is easy and accustomed to the images of every candidate identified by the media which is controlled by the institutions,and which control as well over the powerful politicians by the power of facilities and making the financial and the personal issues for the media decision-makers.

The close period of the elections is the period of the negotiation which is conducted by the security institutions with the candidates on the details in the agenda of the rule and policies. The wider the difference between the two candidates becomes, the institutions make reasons to narrow the gap by launching investigations or spreading scandals, because the hour of resolving has not come yet, and the two candidates must be weak and in need of the support, as well the swingblock must remainfluctuating of its decision, in this period the companies of poll help in promoting what is needed from them.

What is going on these days is an attrition of the president in order to arrive exhausted.

Translated by LinaShehadeh,

2016-11-04 | عدد القراءات 2425