• The mass media which is funded by Saudi Arabia strained to link its sadness after the failure of its bet on the arrival of Hillary Clinton to the American Presidency with what shows the disadvantages of the new American President Donald Trump either his racism against the Muslims and the Arabs or his distinctive outlook to Israel, to the extent that it is expected that there is someone who talks about Trump as an Arab President.
• The welcoming of the arrival of Trump to presidency in the Arab world neither stems from supporting his ideas nor from the admiration of his positions and personality, but it is restricted by two issues that based on that the US presidential choices are between Trump and Hillary and everything which comes as a result ofthe comparisonis between them..
• The first criterion of the comparison is between the calls for the military intervention in Syria by Clinton, and the calls of Trump to make an understanding with Russia about the war on terrorism.
• The second criterion of the comparison is the status of Saudi Arabia which constitutes the reason of the calamity of the Arabs, which gets more strength from American President who comforts it, and it is known the variation of this status between Trump and Clinton.
• The people feel happy toward a president who hates them but calls for the isolation of the interventions, and where Saudi Arabia cannot bribe him, and feel happy toward the failure of a bad candidate who hates them and calls for waging wars and who is purchased by Saudi Arabia.

Translated by LinaShehadeh,

2016-11-10 | عدد القراءات 2320