Nasser Kandil wrote: The negotiation on a hot tin in Moscow

  • It seems that the US strike against Syria after the US-Russian negotiations of Moscow was the last military strikes not because it was determined like that, but because what has resulted has imposed that.
  • The strike did not succeed in creating a new situation in Syria, despite that it was a demand since six years from Washington’s allies the Syrians and the regional allies; but it did not grant them what they supposed that it might lead to the change of the balances.
  • The armed groups did not succeed in having control on one new site by the force of the supposed change.
  • The morale and the capabilities of the army and the allies were not affected.
  • The coherent alliance of Syria, Iran, Russia, and Hezbollah was not affected.
  • The strike did not lead to a breakdown in the morale of the Syrian people that was translated by the displacement of millions across the borders as the US intelligence expected.
  • The strike led to a Russian threat of stopping the cooperation and the coordination.
  • Russia decided to supply the Syrian army with everything needed to combat the subsequent strikes, it has disclosed their nature and the preparation for them.
  • Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah have reached to an understanding to deal the US presence as an occupation.
  • The disagreements between Moscow and Washington are continuous, but America cannot bet on its solution militarily.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2017-04-13 | عدد القراءات 2118