Nasser Kandil wrote: What about their Psychological warfare ?

Whether the goal of the US strike and the massacre of Al Rashideen was a psychological warfare or not, it was an important test of morale.
The higher moral support for Al Nusra is the US intervention especially in a terrible crime such as the crime which took the lives of the innocent people of Fouaa and Kafriya.
On the rhythm of the two processes, the battles in the field continued and led to a winner and a loser, so they were not a marking time.
The field says that on the rhythm of these two great wars Al Nusra lost Suran which is the stronghold of the militants. Al Nusra considered the entry to it a transition in the course of war; but today the entry to it was by the Syrian army.
By measuring the morale, there are those whose morale increased and those whose morale decreased and faded.
Al Nusra has lost instead of winning; at least this means that the morale of its elements did not make use of what has happened.
The army has launched its attack burdened with the sacrifices of the martyrs but its morals if it did not increase, it would not affect its resolution.
It is a statement of account of the future which will prevent any thought that can lead to a change in the balances of morale, in order to change the course of war against the Syrian army.
What was not done by the Tomahawk and the massacres will not be done by others.