• Some media which is close to Hamas deals with the Qatari decision of alienating its leaders as a tactical event that requires the arrangement of transferring some of its leaders and the places of their residence, while it is a fateful station in the track of the movement.
• Qatar’s decision of deporting is an expression of the choice of Hamas’s new allies which is set by Washington, its center is an Israeli security interest that says that the last political document of Hamas does not concern us, however what is needed is to treat Hamas as a terrorist movement till it announced its abandonment of the resistance.
• Hamas has frozen its resistance practically in the Qatari-Turkish era despite the remaining of its military wing and many personnel with this option.
• Normalizing the relations between Hamas and Egypt is a rational required vital decision for a movement which its cause is Palestine and its central presence in Gaza, but it neither solves the problem nor responds to the main question.
• If Hamas wanted to stop the pressure of the governments which have alliance relations with Washington, then the only way would be to abandon the resistance.
• If Hamas wanted to arrange its affairs on the basis of the resistance choice, then the beginning would be a public new language about Syria, because it is the origin of the problem.
• Iran is a choice rather than geography.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2017-06-05 | عدد القراءات 1895