- Washington did not consider the value of its raids which targeted the Syrian and allied forces in Badia and the losses which caused by them, but as a warning message to draw red lines.
- Washington said that it drew these lines, and it considered them to be embargoed zone for the Syrian army and its allies although they are Syrian territories.
- Moscow said that what Washington is doing in the territories of a sovereign country is a violation of the international law, and according to the concept of the cooperation among the participants in the war on terrorism it is an individual illegitimate behavior.
- Washington insisted and it continued the attacks.
- A statement has been issued by the military operations room of the allies; it said we do not recognize your red lines and our silence will not last so long.
- There was a talk about the statement, it wonders about the meaning of the right to respond and its timing.
- In less than twenty-four hours the Pentagon said that there is a serious incident occurred near Al Tanf, a drone belonging to the Syrian army or its allies has targeted the US troops and announced its dropping, considering what has happened was a serious transformation that it does not want to put it in a clash with the Syrian army.
- The Pentagon announced that it asked for Moscow's mediation to prevent the escalation.
- The Syrian-Iraqi bordered line is not red line, neither for Syria nor for Iraq.
Translated by Lina Shehadeh,
2017-06-12 | عدد القراءات 2043