• The Israeli media has dealt with the last speech of Al Sayyed Hassan Narollah from the perspective of threat which he launched against the terrorist groups in JoroudArsal, it considered it a threat of changing the sectarian balances, since it considered that the armed groups of Al Nusra and ISIS as a military element of balance against Hezbollah.
• The question is for the Lebanese parties which showed concern about the speech of Al SayyedNasrollah twice:
• Once, whether they pay attention to the meaning of their convergence with Israel in one position.
• And once, if they have the same reasons to concern, where they find ISIS and Al Nusra as their militias to make a military balance with Hezbollah.
• The Israelis demanded from Saudi Arabia to exert pressure internationally on the Lebanese country to prevent the threats of Hezbollah and to restrict the war with the Lebanese army, as if they adopt the words of the Lebanese objectors against Nasrollah's words, orrecall the US speech about refusing the role of the Popular Crowd in Iraq which without it the war on ISIS was not resolved. It was proven to the Iraqis that its goal was to prevent the resolving, this was the demand of Israel from disrupting the role of Hezbollah to prevent the resolving.
• Israel is worried that Hezbollah will confront it after getting rid of ISIS and Al Nusra, so why are some of the Lebanese afraid?
• Is not that disgraceful to have the same aspiration of Saudi Arabia which is against Hezbollah, and in favor of the staying of the terrorists and for the same goals of Israel?

 Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2017-07-21 | عدد القراءات 2069