Nasser Kandil wrote: Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Syria

Saudi Arabia has always linked its politics in Lebanon with its politics in Syria; it rarely separates them from its considerations towards Iran.
Syria was always the origin in the Saudi consideration.
Just like that Saad Al-Hariri abandoned the accusation of Syria of killing his father, because Saudi Arabia has an interest in presenting a positive initiative towards Syria, and just like that Al Mustaqbal Movement has turned into an incubator for Al Nusra front in Arsal when Saudi Arabia decided to bomb Syria.
Knowing what Saudi Arabia wants from Lebanon between the escalating language of Al Sabhani, Al Mashnouk, and the quiet behavior of Al-Hariri is shown by what Saudi Arabia is doing in Syria.
The Army of Islam will make a settlement with the Syrian country under Egyptian-Russian sponsorship.
The opponents who are affiliated to Saudi Arabia gather to arrange their ranks under Saudi request, in preparation for Geneva talks and in accordance to a Russian book of terms after Moscow understandings between Salman and Putin.
In the political speech of Saudi Arabia about the political solution in Syria there is a traditional phrase that has been omitted, it is about linking the solution with the departure of the Syrian President.
The escalation with Iran at the US rhythm does not prevent the Russian mediation to arrange Saudi -Iranian dialogue.
The verbal escalation in Lebanon is no more than a barrier against the Lebanese groups which are operated by Saudi Arabia to prevent them from opening special passages with Syria before the reconciliation, because they are Saudi negotiating paper. The weak Riyadh has pledged the Syrian-Lebanese relationship to the Syrian-Saudi relationship, and the relationship with Hezbollah is pledged to the Saudi –Iranian relationship, and it is forbidden for the Lebanese people of Riyadh to have conciliation but under its permission.