• The confrontation in Syria took place between two projects that are clear in their parties and their goals. After the axis of the resistance and Syria were at a state of defense and their project was the steadfastness for years, it turned two years ago after fortifying the elements of force into an attack to achieve a balance. The battle of Aleppo was the interval battle in stabilizing that balance.
• Washington's axis tried to deny the new balance, so there were the raid on Al Shuairat Airport, and the Israeli raids. The bet on the red lines about the Syrian-Iraqi borders and the steadfastness of ISIS in Palmyra and Deir Al Zour was to disrupt the progress of the project of Syria and its allies.
• Through the battles of Palmyra, Deir Al Zour and Boukamal, the military project of Syria and its allies under the title of liberating the entire Syria, and presenting Astana and Sochi drafts for the political solution along with Geneva formula have enhanced that balance.
• The success in restricting Turkey was among the results of the battles of balance and Astana formula. The battle of Al Ghouta was to grant the project of Syria and its allies an opportunity to have control on the political and military decision in Syria by alienating the axis led by Washington and subjecting it to the fait accompli that Al Ghouta has a pivotal role in the unity of Syria and its security.
• The aggression which targeted Syria and which tried to avoid the open clash cannot ignore the political and the military tracks of the Syrian state and its allies, and cannot keep the opportunities of partnership for the aggression committers in the next tracks.
• The aggression is a declaration of the end of Geneva path and an imposition of a single political military path in favor of Syria and its allies, until Geneva becomes as Sochi.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,

2018-04-19 | عدد القراءات 1650