It was striking that the Prime Minister of the occupation Benjamin Netanyahu talked
resoundingly before the General Assembly of the United Nations against Iran and the
resistance, but all the facts refer that Israel’s situation is becoming worse, weaker, and
unable to take any risk in Lebanon or in Iran. He knows in advance that the cost will be
existential against its entity not mere military, material, and humanitarian results.
 The talk about Syria and the continuation of the aggressive operations on it has become
an issue of great doubts in the light of the growing crisis with Russia and in the light of
the Russian qualitative decisions of providing Syria with what it needs to repel the
aggression and to infect Israel morally and materially if it is involved.
 What was striking in his speech was the repetitive indication that Iraq has become on the
list of targeting. This is not a new Iraqi matter, it is related to the effective presence of the
resistance forces for years, and the war on Syria is a witness of this effectiveness.
 What is new is something related to Israel. The feeling of weakness and the inability are
the reasons of the Israeli seeking for alternatives to face-saving and not to involve in
unbearable wars. The Israeli bet is on the fragile political situation of Iraq on one hand,
and on the US direct presence militarily especially in the Iraqi airspace as a guarantor of
the aggression on the other hand.
 The Israeli thinking of the aggression on Iraq is serious, it requires from the resistance
forces which are concerned with the strategic position of Iraq in the resistance axis to
fortify Iraq against the Israeli seeking to make it a tactical alternative that hides the
strategic inability of the occupation entity.
Translated

2018-10-02 | عدد القراءات 1619