The Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran has done well when he responded
quickly to the rude declarations of the Deputy Assistant of the US Secretary Of State
David Hill in the presence of the Prime Minister and his choosing the same place to
respond.
 Recently, Washington has made visits to its diplomatic corps employees to Beirut.
These visits have one function; to make use of platforms to make statements and
positions which were carefully prepared before the visit and away from its
discussions.
 The Americans think that diplomatically Lebanon is an open arena, because no one
stops their bully practices that do not abide by the diplomatic rules of any sovereign
country. They bet that Lebanon through its divisions among who follow them and
who oppose them is living in a state of balance that prevents deterring them from
committing such an immoral exploitation.
 Because according to the Americans Iran is a nightmare that concerns them, because
it is the most important support of the forces of the resistance which terrify Israel,
they want to reassure the Israelis through their presence in Beirut attacking the forces
of the resistance and Iran.
 The Iranian response is a successful beginning that will impose an accumulative
process that puts the Americans between either their continuation of disturbing the
Iranians and thus disturbing Israel or to reconsider their own behavior.
Translated

2019-01-30 | عدد القراءات 1587