The powerful countries of Europe did not leave the NATO, as Turkey. Without France,
Britain, and Turkey the NATO becomes mere an international façade of the US army.
But by searching for divisions between the American policies and the European –Turkish
ones, Iran will emerge as the cause.
 When Iran succeeded in dismantling the coalition led by Washington for decades
especially in the issues that are related to form a political military force for war and peace
and around which the meeting was held between Washington and the European capitals
and Ankara, then this means that the Iranian power has succeeded politically,
economically , and militarily through showing the difference between the concept of the
national security of the countries close to the most important region in the world and the
concept of the national security of the countries belonging to the NATO. This alone
explains the positions of Europe and Turkey which are different from the American
positions whether concerning the Iranian nuclear file, or in transferring the embassies to
Jerusalem, or in the Deal of the Century. The war on Syria was the most important
example in showing this difference after the American failure and the fall of the
European – Turkish bets on the American role.
 It is not surprising that Europe and Turkey fear from the American withdrawal, talking
differently about the intentions to stay, but these intentions will not last and have no
horizon, but they express the resentment from the American selfishness at the expense of
the allies who are facing alone losses and paying the bills of war ignited by America.
 The success of Iran is inseparable from its success in ensuring a strategic alliance with
Russia and China interpreted in the war on Syria, as interpreted by the Russian refusal of
bargains offered by Washington against Iran. But if Iran was not a major strategic force,
this alliance and cohesion would not exist.
Translated

2019-02-19 | عدد القراءات 1805